"The quality of life in neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy of esophage" by Richard Malthaner, Edward Yu et al.
 

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

April 2022

Journal

Thorac Cancer

First Page

1

Last Page

18

URL with Digital Object Identifier

https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14433

Abstract

Background: We compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patientsundergoing trimodality therapy for resectable stage I-III esophageal cancer.Methods: A total of 96 patients were randomized to standard neoadjuvant cisplatinand 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (neoadjuvant) followed by surgicalresection or adjuvant cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and epirubicin chemotherapy with concurrentextended volume radiotherapy (adjuvant) following surgical resection.Results: There was no significant difference in the functional assessment of cancertherapy-esophageal (FACT-E) total scores between arms at 1 year (p = 0.759) with36% versus 41% (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant), respectively, showing an increase of ≥15points compared to pre-treatment (p = 0.638). The HRQOL was significantly inferiorat 2 months in the neoadjuvant arm for FACT-E, European Organization for Researchand Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-OG25), andEuroQol 5-D-3 L in the dysphagia, reflux, pain, taste, and coughing domains(p andlt; 0.05). Half of patients were able to complete the prescribed neoadjuvant arm chemotherapywithout modification compared to only 14% in the adjuvant arm(p andlt; 0.001). Chemotherapy related adverse events of grade ≥2 occurred significantlymore frequently in the neoadjuvant arm (100% vs. 69%, p andlt; 0.001). Surgery relatedadverse events of grade ≥2 were similar in both arms (72% vs. 86%, p = 0.107). Therewere no 30-day mortalities and 2% vs. 10% 90-day mortalities (p = 0.204). There wereno significant differences in either overall survival (OS) (5-year: 35% vs. 32%,p = 0.409) or disease-free survival (DFS) (5-year: 31% vs. 30%, p = 0.710).Conclusion: Trimodality therapy is challenging for patients with resectable esophagealcancer regardless of whether it is given before or after surgery. Newer and less toxicprotocols are needed.

Notes

Open access

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 3
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 2
  • Captures
    • Readers: 30
see details

Share

COinS