Communication Sciences and Disorders Publications

Validity and reliability of integrated pressure level real-ear-to-coupler difference measurements

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-2-2023

Journal

International Journal of Audiology

URL with Digital Object Identifier

10.1080/14992027.2023.22050009

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To validate the measurement of foam-tip real-ear-to-coupler differences (wRECD) using an integrated pressure level (IPL) method and (2) to compare the reliability of this method to SPL-based measurement of the wRECD. Design SPL-based wRECD and the proposed IPL wRECD measurement were completed bilaterally. Test-retest reliability of IPL wRECD was determined with full re-insertion into the ear canal and compared to published SPL wRECD test-retest data. Study sample 22 adults with normal hearing and middle ear status were recruited. Results Differences between SPL-based wRECD and IPL wRECD measurements were within 1.51 dB on average below 5000 Hz. At and above 5000 Hz, IPL wRECD exceeded SPL wRECDs by 6.11 dB on average. The average test-retest difference for IPL wRECD across all assessed frequencies was 0.75 dB with the greatest improvements in reliability found below 750 Hz and above 3000 Hz. Conclusions IPL wRECD yielded improved estimates compared to SPL wRECD in high frequencies, where standing-wave interference is present. Independence from standing wave interference resulted in increased wRECD values above 4000 Hz using the IPL measurement paradigm. IPL wRECD is more reliable than SPL wRECD, does not require precise probe-microphone placement, and provides a wider valid wRECD bandwidth than SPL-based measurement.

Citation of this paper:

Matthew Urichuk, David Purcell & Susan Scollie (2023) Validity and reliability of integrated pressure level real-ear-to-coupler difference measurements, International Journal of Audiology, DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2205009

Share

COinS