Title

Comparing Two Strategies of Dynamic Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (dIMRT) with 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) in the Hypofractionated Treatment of High-risk Prostate Cancer

Authors

Jasper Yuen, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON
George Rodrigues, University of Western OntarioFollow
Kristina Trenka, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON
Terry Coad, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON
Slav Yartsev, University of Western OntarioFollow
David D'Souza, University of Western OntarioFollow
Michael Lock, University of Western OntarioFollow
Glenn Bauman, University of Western OntarioFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-7-2008

Journal

Radiation Oncology

Volume

3

Issue

1

Abstract

Background: To compare two strategies of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT) with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in the setting of hypofractionated high-risk prostate cancer treatment.

Methods: 3DCRT and dIMRT/Helical Tomotherapy(HT) planning with 10 CT datasets was undertaken to deliver 68 Gy in 25 fractions (prostate) and simultaneously delivering 45 Gy in 25 fractions (pelvic lymph node targets) in a single phase. The paradigms of pelvic vessel targeting (iliac vessels with margin are used to target pelvic nodes) and conformal normal tissue avoidance (treated soft tissues of the pelvis while limiting dose to identified pelvic critical structures) were assessed compared to 3DCRT controls. Both dIMRT/HT and 3DCRT solutions were compared to each other using repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc paired t-tests.

Results: When compared to conformal pelvic vessel targeting, conformal normal tissue avoidance delivered more homogenous PTV delivery (2/2 t-test comparisons; p < 0.001), similar nodal coverage (8/8 t-test comparisons; p = ns), higher and more homogenous pelvic tissue dose (6/6 t-test comparisons; p < 0.03), at the cost of slightly higher critical structure dose (Ddose, 1-3 Gy over 5/10 dose points; p < 0.03). The dIMRT/HT approaches were superior to 3DCRT in sparing organs at risk (22/24 t-test comparisons; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: dIMRT/HT nodal and pelvic targeting is superior to 3DCRT in dose delivery and critical structure sparing in the setting of hypofractionation for high-risk prostate cancer. The pelvic targeting paradigm is a potential solution to deliver highly conformal pelvic radiation treatment in the setting of nodal location uncertainty in prostate cancer and other pelvic malignancies.

Notes

Published in: Radiation Oncology, 2008, 3:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-3-1