Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository

What to Say and How to Say It: the Interplay of Self-Disclosure Depth, Similarity, and Interpersonal Liking in Initial Social Interactions

Yixian Li, The University of Western Ontario

Abstract

We often initiate social relationships with others through revelations of personal information, or self-disclosure. Self-disclosure is heavily involved in shaping interpersonal liking, but there are disparate and sometimes contradictory findings in the literature regarding the causal relationship between them. Moreover, a lack of careful control in experimental designs in many existing studies failed to eliminate important confounding factors that might provide alternative explanations for the disclosure-liking relationship. Here, we examined the relationships between self-disclosure and interpersonal liking during initial social interactions, while carefully controlling for a potential confounding factor, similarity between the social partners.

Across the first five experiments, I independently manipulated disclosers’ self-disclosure depth, i.e., how personal and intimate the disclosures are, and their self-disclosed similarity with their social partners. High self-disclosed similarity was consistently found to lead to greater initial liking of a discloser. In comparison, the experiments failed to find support for the idea that people favor those who self-disclose more deeply, as suggested in the literature. In Experiment 6, I manipulated initial liking within a set of social partners and successfully replicated another disclosure-liking relationship identified in the literature, namely, the effect that people self-disclose to a greater extent to those whom they like. It was also found that, contrary to the expectation, participants’ risk-taking tendencies negatively predicted their self-disclosure depth to others. In Experiment 7, I extended the investigation to an emerging and novel social context and examined how self-disclosed similarity from an Artificially Intelligent (AI) agent influenced people’s perceptions of and responses to the agent. A significant interaction between the perceived identity of the partner (i.e., AI versus human) and level of self-disclosed similarity was found. The results were interpreted in light of the “uncanny valley effect”, which suggests that a high level of human realism displayed by an automatic agent could elicit unpleasant or “eerie” feelings.

Through this series of experiments, I iteratively developed the paradigm to more closely mimic real-world social disclosures. The findings help disentangle the causal relationship between self-disclosure and initial liking and provide insights into some of the subtleties and processes underlying relationship formation.