Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository

Thesis Format

Monograph

Degree

Master of Arts

Program

History

Supervisor

Rhoden, Nancy L.

2nd Supervisor

Shire, Laurel Clarke

Abstract

This thesis examines female perspectives of tyranny within the political and domestic realms. Combining a close reading of their written works with biographical studies of their lives, this thesis looks specifically at three elite, highly literate New England women: Abigail Adams, Mercy Otis Warren, and Judith Sargent Murray. These women were unable to formally participate in the political sphere, yet through their writing they responded to and offered commentary on the Revolution. Utilizing the same language and arguments they and other male patriots used in the Revolution, these three women innovated, following arguments about tyranny through to their natural conclusion, and applying them to relations within the home, they recognized that husbands and fathers also held the potential for tyranny. For them the domestic realm was not apolitical, but the epicenter of the power imbalances between men and women, and this structural imbalance mirrored the problems of inequality within society.

Summary for Lay Audience

This thesis looks at women’s perspectives of tyranny within the American Revolution and the home. Combining a close reading of their written works with biographical studies of their lives, this thesis looks specifically at three elite, highly literate women: Abigail Adams, Mercy Otis Warren, and Judith Sargent Murray. These women were unable to participate in politics or public life. Remarkably, though, through their writing, these women still responded to and offered commentary on the Revolution, a highly political and traditionally male event. These three women were innovative and applied political arguments about British tyranny, used during the Revolution, to the family and home. Extending arguments about political tyranny, these women recognized that husbands and fathers held the same power as the King had on a smaller scale. The same threat of tyranny that the King held, therefore, also existed within husbands and fathers. For them the domestic realm was not apolitical, but the epicenter of the power imbalances between men and women, and this structural imbalance mirrored the problems of inequality within society.

Share

COinS