Thesis Format
Integrated Article
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Program
Geography and Environment
Supervisor
Gilliland, Jason A.
Abstract
Parks and protected areas in Canada may contribute to improved population health by providing venues for social interaction, settings for physical activity, and spaces for mental restoration. There is a plethora of evidence linking parks to physical and mental health, however, there is a dearth of evidence about how parks may affect wellbeing. This dissertation investigates how the wellbeing of Canadians is associated with geographic accessibility to, exposure within, and the quality of parks. This investigation is carried out using three different methodologies. Data collection occurred in Halifax, Nova Scotia; London, Ontario; Montreal, Quebec; North Vancouver, British Columbia; Prince Albert, Saskatchewan; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; Winnipeg, Manitoba; and Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. First, the amenity, infrastructure, and safety quality of parks were assessed using a standardized audit tool adapted from prior evaluation tools. Quality scores were then compared with indices of multiple deprivation of the population within each study area to evaluate the extent of any socio-spatial inequalities. Notably, park quality does not significantly differ based on socioeconomic or demographic composition of the surrounding neighbourhood. Instead, park quality differs based on measures of residential stability and situational vulnerability. Second, a survey was undertaken on a large population of Canadians in the study areas to understand how geographic accessibility to parks may affect wellbeing while also considering demographic and attitudinal factors. Geographic accessibility to parks did not significantly correlate with better or worse wellbeing scores. Third, a novel geographic ecological momentary assessment research platform was developed and implemented to assess how actual geographic exposure to parks affects perceived wellbeing. A sample of survey participants were asked to complete a short survey via the platform multiple times per day, as well as whenever they dwelled inside or exited a park. The wellbeing scores of participants who were exposed to parks in the past 24 hours did not significantly differ from those who had no exposure to parks. The research platform described in the dissertation is a major contribution to health geography research methods. Overall, this dissertation provides foundational evidence to further explore public health and parks planning-based interventions to improve population health and wellbeing.
Summary for Lay Audience
Parks and protected areas in Canada provide places to be physically active, mentally relax, and socialize. Parks are also the most common places to access nature in cities. Therefore, parks are likely to contribute to better physical and mental health. However, there is little causal evidence that links parks to wellbeing. This dissertation investigates how the wellbeing of Canadians is affected by geographic access to, exposure within, and the quality of parks. Data collection took place in Halifax, Nova Scotia; London, Ontario; Montreal, Quebec; North Vancouver, British Columbia; Prince Albert, Saskatchewan; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; Winnipeg, Manitoba; and Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. This investigation of how parks affect wellbeing used three different methods. First, park quality was assessed using a new audit tool developed from other tools. Park quality scores were compared with the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation to determine if park quality differs based on measures of social or demographic inequality. Notably, park quality does not significantly differ based on socioeconomic or demographic composition of the surrounding neighbourhood. Instead, park quality differs based on measures of residential stability and situational vulnerability. Second, a survey was undertaken to understand how geographic accessibility to parks may affect wellbeing. Geographic accessibility to parks did not relate to better or worse wellbeing scores. Third, a novel software platform was developed to take observations of participants’ wellbeing twice per day along with whenever a participant was inside or had left a park. The platform also continuously logged participant’s locations. Participants who were exposed to parks in the past 24 hours did not have different wellbeing scores. This research platform is a major contribution to health geography research methods. Overall, this dissertation contributes to understanding how urban planning and public health policy can be used to improve people’s health and wellbeing.
Recommended Citation
Wray, Alexander, "Do parks help us feel well? An investigation of park quality, and the wellbeing impacts from park experiences in Canada" (2024). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 10455.
https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/10455
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.