Date of Award

2007

Degree Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science

Program

Psychology

Supervisor

Dr. John Meyer

Second Advisor

Dr. Joan Finegan

Abstract

Understanding the commitments both an employee and his or her employer make to each other is important to organizations. I explore these commitments by examining the relation between employee commitments and employer psychological contracts (i.e., promises employers make to their employees). Traditionally, psychological contracts have been measured based on the contents of the contract (e.g., promotion opportunities), making it difficult to generalize findings across work arrangements. Instead, I adopt and extend a new approach to examining psychological contracts by looking at the contracts’ features (e.g., stable). Employees from a variety of organizations completed surveys on their organizational commitment and perceptions of their employers’ psychological contracts. Results illustrated a clear picture of what features correlated with desired forms of commitment (i.e., affective and normative) compared to a less desired form of commitment (i.e., continuance) and the uncommitted. Implications of the findings for management and directions for future research are also presented.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.