Event Title
STR-934: FATIGUE RESPONSE OF UHPC AS A CLOSURE STRIP MATERIAL IN PREFABRICATED BRIDGE APPLICATIONS
Location
London
Event Website
http://www.csce2016.ca/
Description
Replacement of concrete bridge decks can be an expensive process. In order to decrease costs and time of construction, precast deck panels can be used with closure strips cast in place between the panels. In order to ensure that these connections can withstand the rigors of a bridge’s life cycle, fatigue testing was completed on a specimen consisting of two precast concrete panels reinforced with GFRP and connected using a UHPC closure strip. These panels were subjected to 2,000,000 cycles of fatigue loading at three locations and subject to static failure loading at one location following fatigue loads. It was found that under fatigue loading the panels were able to maintain structural integrity while deflection values increased linearly following the initial cracking phase. At ultimate load, the panel failed in punching shear at levels less than those specified by bridge code. This is primarily due to the failure location adjacent to the closure strip failing on three punching shear planes and one plane along the interface between the UHPC.
Included in
STR-934: FATIGUE RESPONSE OF UHPC AS A CLOSURE STRIP MATERIAL IN PREFABRICATED BRIDGE APPLICATIONS
London
Replacement of concrete bridge decks can be an expensive process. In order to decrease costs and time of construction, precast deck panels can be used with closure strips cast in place between the panels. In order to ensure that these connections can withstand the rigors of a bridge’s life cycle, fatigue testing was completed on a specimen consisting of two precast concrete panels reinforced with GFRP and connected using a UHPC closure strip. These panels were subjected to 2,000,000 cycles of fatigue loading at three locations and subject to static failure loading at one location following fatigue loads. It was found that under fatigue loading the panels were able to maintain structural integrity while deflection values increased linearly following the initial cracking phase. At ultimate load, the panel failed in punching shear at levels less than those specified by bridge code. This is primarily due to the failure location adjacent to the closure strip failing on three punching shear planes and one plane along the interface between the UHPC.
https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/csce2016/London/Structural/81
