A pilot randomised clinical trial of mepolizumab in COPD with eosinophilic bronchitis.
Document Type
Letter to the Editor
Publication Date
3-15-2017
Journal
The European Respiratory Journal
Volume
49
Issue
3
First Page
1602486
URL with Digital Object Identifier
https://doi.org/ 10.1183/13993003.02486-2016
Abstract
Airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with influx of various inflammatory cells (e.g. eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages) into the airways. Approximately one-third of stable COPD patients and one in five COPD exacerbations are associated with eosinophilic bronchitis that usually responds to inhaled or ingested corticosteroids [1]. Specific anti-eosinophil agents like mepolizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against interleukin 5 (IL-5), reduce severe asthma exacerbations and improve lung function [2–4]. The improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is also associated with a decrease in biomarkers of airway remodelling, such as sputum hyaluronan and versican, over a 6-month treatment period [5]. It is not known if the same benefits are observed in patients with COPD and eosinophilia in whom the airflow obstruction is due to cigarette smoke-related bronchitis and emphysema. Airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with influx of various inflammatory cells (e.g. eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages) into the airways. Approximately one-third of stable COPD patients and one in five COPD exacerbations are associated with eosinophilic bronchitis that usually responds to inhaled or ingested corticosteroids [1]. Specific anti-eosinophil agents like mepolizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against interleukin 5 (IL-5), reduce severe asthma exacerbations and improve lung function [2–4]. The improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is also associated with a decrease in biomarkers of airway remodelling, such as sputum hyaluronan and versican, over a 6-month treatment period [5]. It is not known if the same benefits are observed in patients with COPD and eosinophilia in whom the airflow obstruction is due to cigarette smoke-related bronchitis and emphysema.
Notes
This is an author-submitted, peer-reviewed version of a manuscript that has been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal, prior to copy-editing, formatting and typesetting. This version of the manuscript may not be duplicated or reproduced without prior permission from the copyright owner, the European Respiratory Society. The publisher is not responsible or liable for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or in any version derived from it by any other parties. The final, copy-edited, published article, which is the version of record, is available without a subscription 18 months after the date of issue publication. The final published version is available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1183/13993003.02486-2016