Communication Sciences and Disorders Publications

Assessment of Toxic Effects and Survival in Treatment Deescalation With Radiotherapy vs Transoral Surgery for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The ORATOR2 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

David A Palma
Eitan Prisman
Eric Berthelet
Eric Tran
Sarah Hamilton
Jonn Wu
Antoine Eskander
Kevin Higgins
Irene Karam
Ian Poon
Zain Husain
Danny Enepekides
Michael Hier
Khalil Sultanem
Keith Richardson
Alex Mlynarek
Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki
Michael Odell
Andrew Bayley
Samuel Dowthwaite
James E Jackson
Marcin Dzienis
John O'Neil
Shamir Chandarana
Robyn Banerjee
Robert Hart
Jeffson Chung
Todd Tenenholtz
Suren Krishnan
Hien Le
John Yoo
Adrian Mendez
Eric Winquist
Sara Kuruvilla
Paul Stewart
Andrew Warner
Sylvia Mitchell
Jeff Chen
Christina Parker
Bret Wehrli
Keith Kwan
Julie A. Theurer, Western University
Jinka Sathya
J Alex Hammond
Nancy Read
Varagur Venkatesan
S Danielle MacNeil
Kevin Fung
Anthony C Nichols

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The optimal approach for treatment deescalation in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To assess a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach vs a primary transoral surgical (TOS) approach in treatment deescalation for HPV-related OPSCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This international, multicenter, open-label parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 9 tertiary academic cancer centers in Canada and Australia and enrolled patients with T1-T2N0-2 p16-positive OPSCC between February 13, 2018, and November 17, 2020. Patients had up to 3 years of follow-up.

INTERVENTIONS: Primary RT (consisting of 60 Gy of RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin in node-positive patients) vs TOS and neck dissection (ND) (with adjuvant reduced-dose RT depending on pathologic findings).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was overall survival (OS) compared with a historical control. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life, and toxic effects.

RESULTS: Overall, 61 patients were randomized (30 [49.2%] in the RT arm and 31 [50.8%] in the TOS and ND arm; median [IQR] age, 61.9 [57.2-67.9] years; 8 women [13.6%] and 51 men [86.4%]; 31 [50.8%] never smoked). The trial began in February 2018, and accrual was halted in November 2020 because of excessive toxic effects in the TOS and ND arm. Median follow-up was 17 months (IQR, 15-20 months). For the OS end point, there were 3 death events, all in the TOS and ND arm, including the 2 treatment-related deaths (0.7 and 4.3 months after randomization, respectively) and 1 of myocardial infarction at 8.5 months. There were 4 events for the PFS end point, also all in the TOS and ND arm, which included the 3 mortality events and 1 local recurrence. Thus, the OS and PFS data remained immature. Grade 2 to 5 toxic effects occurred in 20 patients (67%) in the RT arm and 22 (71%) in the TOS and ND arm. Mean (SD) MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores at 1 year were similar between arms (85.7 [15.6] and 84.7 [14.5], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, TOS was associated with an unacceptable risk of grade 5 toxic effects, but patients in both trial arms achieved good swallowing outcomes at 1 year. Long-term follow-up is required to assess OS and PFS outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03210103.