The Effectiveness of Gain- versus Loss-Framed Advertisements to Minimize Hazardous Drinking among University Students: A Test of Regulatory Fit
Master of Science
Dr. Leora Swartzman
University binge drinking is a concern. Traditionally, social norms marketing campaigns have been employed. Regulatory focus theory – based on the premise that behavior is driven either by the motivation to maximize gains (promotion) or to minimize losses (prevention) – offers an alternative approach to crafting persuasive appeals in this population. This study investigated the effectiveness of gain-framed versus loss-framed advertisements in lowering drinking intentions in a university sample. It further explored whether the effects were moderated by regulatory focus – primed and dispositional – and trait reactance. Online surveys were completed by 208 Introductory Psychology students (51.7% female, mean age = 19.0 [SD =1.78]). Message framing did not interact with regulatory focus to create regulatory fit. However, those high in promotion focus and females were more responsive to the ads, particularly the loss-framed ones, whereas those high in reactance were less responsive to the ads. Implications for tailoring anti-binge drinking ads are discussed.
Keywords: alcohol, message framing, reactance, regulatory focus, university
Gunay, Barlas, "The Effectiveness of Gain- versus Loss-Framed Advertisements to Minimize Hazardous Drinking among University Students: A Test of Regulatory Fit" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1414.
Clinical Psychology Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Other Public Health Commons, Social Psychology Commons, Substance Abuse and Addiction Commons