Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology measurement: Recommendations for measure selection, data analysis, and participant recruitment

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2020

Journal

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Volume

129

Issue

1

First Page

21

Last Page

28

URL with Digital Object Identifier

10.1037/abn0000464

Abstract

© 2019 American Psychological Association. Transdiagnostic frameworks such as the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) offer an exciting future for psychopathology research but may pose measurement and data analytic challenges because historically researchers have often relied on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) to guide psychopathology assessment. We address these challenges by providing recommendations for (a) measure selection, (b) data analysis, and (c) participant recruitment when conducting research from a transdiagnostic, dimensional perspective. Examples presented demonstrate how both broad psychopathology spectra and specific symptom dimensions can be assessed efficiently via interview, informant, and self-rated methods. Using these dimensional assessment approaches rather than DSM categories can enhance precision when examining symptom relations for RDoC mechanisms and in treatment contexts. Additionally, alternative strategies to using DSM diagnostic status for participant selection can expedite study recruitment and maximize sample sizes. Thus, incorporating these recommendations can streamline research and improve measurement in many ways. We hope that these guidelines will facilitate integration among different transdiagnostic frameworks that have emerged to address limitations of the DSM.

Notes

This article is paywalled; please seek access through your institution's library

Find in your library

Share

COinS