Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2021
Journal
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Volume
55
Issue
10
First Page
942
Last Page
943
URL with Digital Object Identifier
10.1177/0004867421998765
Abstract
This viewpoint is a continuation of the debate on the early intervention movement in psychiatry. The criticisms of Malhi and colleagues have generated some fundamental questions about the priorities of the early intervention movement and the need for further work. In particular, the summons sent to neuroscience need to be more specific in the near future. We may be doing well with what we have, but more directed efforts are needed to purposefully seek what we do not.
COinS