Whose finger on the nuclear trigger: The U.S. election focuses the mind on who will be commander-in-chief - and why we continue to have nuclear weapons anyway

Authors

Erika Simpson, University of Western Ontario (Western University)Follow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-17-2016

Journal

London Free Press

Abstract

The U.S. presidential election underscores the critical issue of nuclear weapons and the challenges of nuclear deterrence. As the next commander-in-chief may have to make split-second decisions on nuclear strikes, the stakes are high given the rapid response times required during crises. The article critiques both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s positions on nuclear strategy, emphasizing the risks associated with their potential decision-making. Despite the pressing need for nuclear disarmament, U.S. candidates show limited commitment to eliminating nuclear arsenals. The global movement for disarmament, including efforts by mayors, religious leaders, and organizations, calls for urgent action. Canada, despite its NATO ties, has the opportunity to support international disarmament initiatives and advocate for a nuclear-free world.

Notes

First published in the London Free Press