Geography Publications

Title

Evaluating Qualitative Research in Social Geography: Establishing ‘Rigour’ in Interview Analysis

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1997

Journal

Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers

Volume

22

Issue

4

First Page

505

Last Page

525

URL with Digital Object Identifier

DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00505.x

Abstract

A review of 31 empirical and eighteen substantive papers by qualitative social geographers mainly using in-depth interviews reveals little explicit reference to the principle(s) adopted to enhance ‘rigour’ and to ensure meaningful inference. Given the modest explicit discussion of evaluative criteria in these papers, a scheme from evaluation research itself is critically reviewed. A set of evaluation questions derived from this review and their application to an empirical piece of qualitative work frame an argument for a general set of criteria rather than rigid rules for assessing qualitative work. Such criteria can serve as anchor points for qualitative evaluation.

This document is currently not available here.


Find in your library

Share

COinS