Bone and Joint Institute

Document Type


Publication Date



Canadian Journal of Surgery





First Page


Last Page


URL with Digital Object Identifier



© 2017 Joule Inc. or its licensors. Background: There are several different techniques commonly used to perform intramedullary (IM) nailing of the femur to fix femoral fractures. We sought to identify significant differences in outcomes of studies comparing 1) trochanteric and piriformis entry and 2) antegrade and retrograde entry in IM nailing of the femur. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase databases and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons websites for comparative studies published from inception to November 2015. Criteria used to select articles for detailed review included use of antegrade and retrograde entry point or use of trochanteric and piriformis entry point for IM nailing of the femur in adult patients. Functional and technical outcomes were extracted from accepted studies. Results: We identified 483 potential studies, of which 52 were eligible. Of these, we included 13 publications and 2 abstracts (2 level I, 7 level II and 6 level III studies). Trochanteric entry significantly reduced operative duration by 14 min compared with piriformis entry (p = 0.030). Retrograde nailing had a greater risk of postoperative knee pain than antegrade nailing (p = 0.05). On the other hand, antegrade nailing had significantly more postoperative hip pain (p = 0.003) and heterotopic ossification (p < 0.001) than retrograde nailing. No significant differences in functional outcomes were observed. Conclusion: Although some significant differences were found, the varying quality of studies made recommendation difficult. Our meta-Analysis did not confirm superiority of either antegrade over retrograde or trochanteric over piriformis entry for IM nailing of the femur. Level of evidence: Level III therapeutic.


Single copies of articles published prior to January 1, 2021 may only be copied or shared for non-commercial educational purposes. Appropriate credits must be given. The distribution of derivative works is not permitted. Please email to obtain consent for any other uses.

The article was originally published at

Hussain, N., Hussain, F. N., Sermer, C., Kamdar, H., Schemitsch, E. H., Sternheim, A., & Kuzyk, P. (2017). Antegrade versus retrograde nailing techniques and trochanteric versus piriformis intramedullary nailing entry points for femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 60(1), 19–29.

Also found at


To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.