This article explores two litigation strategies for challenging Canadian climate change policy, both of which involve constitutional rights and Aboriginal peoples. First, the authors argue that Canada’s climate change policies can be challenged as infringements of the section 7 Charter right to security of the person of Canada’s most northerly Aboriginal peoples. Second, they argue that the impact of insufficient carbon emissions regulation on Aboriginal peoples may violate section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which affirms the rights of Canadian Aboriginal peoples. Although the proposed litigation strategies face a number of challenges, the issues are justiciable. Furthermore, if one of these claims proceeded to trial, the government would be called upon to defend and justify its ongoing failure to reduce Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions.
Andrew Stobo Sniderman & Adam Shedletzky , "Aboriginal Peoples and Legal Challenges to Canadian Climate Change Policy", (2014) 4:2 online: UWO J Leg Stud 1 <http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/uwojls/vol4/iss2/1>.
Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons