<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Scholarship@Western</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Western University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca</link>
<description>Recent documents in Scholarship@Western</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:32:49 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	




<item>
<title>More thinking, less cookbook: redesigning an undergraduate immunology lab course</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/33</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/33</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Department of Microbiology and Immunology at McGill University is in the process of redesigning a core immunology lab course for third year undergraduate student. This course currently uses traditional instructional strategies: didactic lectures and guided “cookbook” labs. We are redesigning this course so that it reflects modern scientific methodologies and evidence-based educational approaches. We have developed learning outcomes based on key competencies and content knowledge in our discipline, and are using these to guide the development of instructional strategies and assessments. The new lab course will feature a problem-based learning approach that will allow students to formulate their own hypothesis and design and carry out an experiment using the reagents at their disposal. The problems that will form the basis of student-designed experiments are being developed through an iterative process. We are soliciting feedback from an advisory group of undergraduate students throughout the phases of this project. Our short & tweet presentation will aim to 1) share our experience in redesigning an immunology lab course, 2) hear your experiences with problem- or inquiry-based lab courses and 3) generate ideas on approaches to redesign labs that actively engage students.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Claire Trottier et al.</author>


<category>Curriculum</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Web-based video resources for cell biology courses</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/32</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/32</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The remarkable increase of information posted on the websites requires critical selection of reliable sources, which can be used for undergraduate and graduate education. These resources represent mostly secondary references that help to deliver complex science concepts to students using visual materials (video clips, movies, and online lectures) and can be efficiently incorporated in a learning management system such as Sakai. As a part of additional resources for the upper year undergraduate courses in cell biology, we introduce references and videos from the websites of the American Society for Cell Biology and the life sciences companies. We have noticed that students become much more confident in performing laboratory exercises with animal cell culture and fluorescence microscopy, once they watched the corresponding video clips on these methods in advance. Primary references are also available on the web including peer reviewed and databases-indexed video journals such as The Journal of Visualized Experiments. We will review and summarize our experience in managing these primary and secondary resources in cell biology class.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Alexander V. Timoshenko</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>So You Are Thinking About Using a Concept Inventory</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/31</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/31</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The use of valid and reliable concept inventories to measure knowledge gains and evaluate student misconceptions has gained popularity in the science disciplines. At the first Western Conference on Science Education we discussed additional merits of using concept inventories and presented some data acquired from using a pre-existing chemistry inventory in our first-year chemistry class. Since then, we have developed our own concept questions, tested them, revised them, and undertaken a number of additional steps, including think aloud interviews, to improve the reliability and validity of our Ryerson Chemistry Concept Inventory. This presentation will offer some reflections about our experiences in the development and testing stages of the project and will be framed in a manner to appeal to anyone, of any discipline, contemplating the use or development of concept inventories.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Noel A. George et al.</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Helping students to pursue deep learning through deep learning: A course designed to help students achieve more learning with less memorizing</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/30</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/30</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>University science educators are encouraged to adopt teaching methods that focus on moving beyond memorization as a form of learning into deeper learning strategies that require application, critical thinking and reflection (Wiemann, 2007). Active teaching methods, along with constructively aligned course designs (Biggs, 2007), aim to facilitate high levels of student engagement and deeper learning.</p>
<p>A new fourth year Life Sciences course at McMaster University taught students about deeper learning while giving them the opportunity to experience deep learning itself. Students were encouraged to enhance their knowledge of science education research and issues, and reflect upon teaching and learning methods, effective for their own learning. As a culminating course project, students created a learning module about a scientific topic of their choice, which aimed to teach audiences from the elementary level to the university level to the general public level. By the end of the course, a diverse array of learning modules were created with topics ranging from the neuroscience of dance improvisation to astrophysics, each of which incorporated different techniques to encourage deeper learning amongst their intended audiences.</p>
<p>Our presentation will showcase student presenters who will share their experiences in the course. They will discuss how the development of their learning modules promoted their own experience of deep learning and how it encouraged them to pursue deep learning techniques in other courses. Ideas that are significant to enhancing the educational experience of students, engaging students in deeper, active learning, and inspiring students to pursue long-term understanding will be presented.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>Biggs, J and Tang, C (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3rd edn) Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press</p>
<p><strong id="x-x-x-docs-internal-guid-16745b97-b07a-6a3c-2909-eda4a5f6458b">Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education?.Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(5), 9-15.</strong></p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anushka Jaffer et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>&quot;Reverse journal club&quot;: Giving students less but asking for more</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/29</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/29</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Although journal clubs are a staple of senior level courses, we propose to use a "reverse journal club" format to evaluate whether students have appropriately synthesized key learning inventory concepts. Briefly, students are given lectures on various topics and then provided with minimal information in the form of figures and figure legends that demonstrate key concepts in neuroscience taken from published journal articles. Students are then asked to provide the context of the experiments, details of the experimental models that were potentially used and possible caveats. This higher level of synthesis, currently used in take home exams will be integrated within various 3rd and 4th year classroom settings in the next semester. This short and tweet presentation will focus on the implementation, successes and caveats associated with this approach.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Bill Ju</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Use of the NutriBiochem Mobile Application in Nutrition &amp; Biochemistry Education</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/28</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/28</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Mobile technology is an expanding field that allows users to study “anytime, anywhere”. Mobile education targets students who are avid users of technology such as smartphones and tablets. Students may benefit from mobile applications as they serve to conveniently provide instructional materials on familiar devices. The NutriBiochem application (app) was developed at the University of Guelph for use in Nutrition and Biochemistry education at the undergraduate level. The app contains 12 modules related to macro/micronutrients and metabolism, with each module consisting of review cards and multiple choice quizzes. Modules cover a range of topics, from micronutrients to lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Review cards include figures, pathway diagrams, and key points. Quiz questions are generated from a pool of over 1000 questions, and feedback detailing student proficiency in various areas is provided upon completion of each quiz. NutriBiochem is available at no cost, for any user with an iOS, Android or BlackBerry device or computer interface; at present, there have been over 3500 downloads across these platforms. The pedagogical impact of this app will be demonstrated by analysis of frequency of app use in relation to student performance, and data regarding user characteristics (such as device and feature preferences) will be presented. It is our goal to determine whether this app is a useful pedagogical tool, and to characterize functions and features of mobile applications that students find appealing.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Saskia A. Teri B.Sc.H et al.</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Use of Lecture Capture in Undergraduate Science Education</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/6</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The continuous nature of the delivery of lecture content, particularly in content-heavy undergraduate science courses, makes it difficult for students to attend to all points of discussion when concurrently taking notes, and it is impossible for students to have full access to lecture content if they are absent from class. Lecture capture provides a way to circumvent these issues, providing students access to lecture content on a personal computing device at flexible times. Given this, it seems plausible that students would benefit from having access to lecture videos, either to supplement or to replace attendance, and that such access might also facilitate learning and improve course performance. However, research regarding the academic and attendance impact of lecture capture is equivocal. Moreover, the nature of catch-up behavior – which is defined as accessing a lecture video that corresponds to a missed class - following an absence has not been well characterized. In this presentation, I will provide data regarding the impact of lecture capture on academic performance and self-reported attendance in a large undergraduate science course, and will demonstrate the catch-up behavior of students in a smaller undergraduate science course in which physical attendance was measured. Outcomes were analyzed in relation to variables including student learning approach (as measured by the R-SPQ-2F) and gender. Additionally, I will present some practical tips and tools for using lecture capture, such as issues of copyright consideration. The goal of this presentation is to help clarify how lecture capture can be used in the context of undergraduate science education, and to show how lecture capture may be used in diverse ways by different students.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Genevieve Newton</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Using Technology to Support the Grading and Distribution of Written Exam Questions for Large Classes</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/18</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/18</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Because marking and returning written work on tests in high-enrollment classes is an unwieldy task, the trend is towards the exclusive use of multiple-choice questions or online quizzes with no individual feedback. Most large-enrollment classes are associated with first-year courses, where students need timely feedback to adjust to the expectations of university-level courses. However, many students do not bother to pick up their midterms once they are made available. If existing technology could be leveraged to scan hand-graded work and distribute digital copies, students could receive timely and confidential feedback in a streamlined, secure and convenient manner.</p>
<p>This presentation will describe a solution developed for a first-year chemistry course to address the issue of timely and individual student feedback for written midterm questions in a large-enrollment class. Scantron® sheets were customized to provide space where open-ended questions could be printed onto both sides of the sheets, along with areas for graders to "bubble-in" individual grades for questions. After questions were hand-graded and scores "bubbled-in", the sheets were scanned to read student identification and their scores on individual questions. At the same time, jpeg images were capture from both sides of the sheets. An application was developed to upload the student data and images to the course management system, where it was electronically returned to students. This solution provides instructors with a mechanism to provide more convenient feedback to students with less administrative headaches.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lori A. Jones</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Space, the Initial Frontier</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/17</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/17</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>It's a truism among those who work in science outreach that the two aspects of science that get people really excited are space and dinosaurs. It seems reasonable to assume that at least some science and engineering students were attracted to our fields because of their interest in these topics. But concepts related to space and/or astronomy don't usually make it into first-year physics textbooks, despite the relevance to the typical first-year curriculum. The students won't all end up being astronomers or aerospace engineers, but can we use their interest in space to help them find fist-year physics more relevant and interesting? What would that look like? Can we extend the "space" hook to other subjects, like chemistry or computer science or even biology? This presentation is intended to be an exploratory discussion combined with a brainstorming session.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Pauline Barmby</author>


<category>Curriculum</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Use of videos to demonstrate and teach techniques and concepts</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/27</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/27</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The advent of digital media provides many affordances for educational use. We employed the use of video to highlight important laboratory practices (i.e. sterile technique), as well as laboratory skills (e.g. cell culture). Educational technology literature is abundant on the benefits of using videos to illustrate skills and procedures. This use has not been widespread as a pedagogical tool for pre-lab lectures in science courses. Our videos were created with the following objectives in mind: (i) To provide students with an intimate illustration of skills and procedures that could be viewed before coming to laboratory sessions; (ii) To provide students with a reference to use while working in the lab; and (iii) To provide students with a resource for known problem areas to be used on-demand, and as often as required. We further developed videos as training tutorials on post-lab skills such as statistical analysis procedures.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michelle Belton et al.</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Use of Nutrition-Related Case-Based Learning Modules to Facilitate Learning in a 2nd Year Biochemistry Course at the University of Guelph</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/26</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/26</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Studies indicate that the majority of students in undergraduate biochemistry take a surface approach to learning, associated with rote memorization of material, rather than a deep approach, which implies higher cognitive processing. This behavior is associated with poorer outcomes, including impaired course performance and reduced knowledge retention. The use of case-based-learning (CBL), a sub-type of problem-based-learning (PBL), and the incorporation of nutrition content into biochemistry teaching may facilitate deep learning by increasing student engagement and interest. This long-term project, aims to modifying the curriculum in an undergraduate Biochemistry course to be focused around nutrition-related cases. The goal is to determine if nutrition-related CBL modules encourage deep learning (measured by R-SPQ-2F), improves student performance (measured by the accuracy of student performance across exam questions using Bloom’s taxonomy), long-term retention (measured by a retention test targeting key Biochemistry concepts) and the student perception of the course experience (measured by the Course Experience Questionnaire). This poster will describe the process of development of the modules, including: (1) types of CBL and how these can be incorporated into undergraduate education, (2) the specific CBL framework adopted for this project and justification for its selection, and (3) examples of developed case studies highlighting the elements designed to facilitate deep learning. While this project is focused specifically on undergraduate biochemistry education, our findings can facilitate adopting CBL with nutrition content to other courses. Consequently, the information presented herein will be of value to undergraduate science educators with an interest in active learning curriculum development.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Verena Kulak et al.</author>


<category>Curriculum</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>The integrative approach to evolution education</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/25</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/25</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Evolution is a broad theory that is difficult for many students to understand. Part of the reason for this may be the tendency of instructors to teach evolution in the context of ecological systems, isolated from genetic and cellular mechanisms. To address this, we developed a set of integrative cases that address evolutionary processes from their origination in DNA mutations, to the production of different proteins, to the fixation of alternate macroscopic phenotypes in reproductively isolated populations. These integrative cases represent a comprehensive approach to teaching evolution across biological sub-disciplines. To date, we have implemented these cases in several introductory biology courses and our preliminary data show that students who more successfully learn evolution in a case context are also more able to (i) explain the molecular basis of mutation, (ii) describe how mutations lead to phenotypic change and (iii) make mechanistic links between genotypes and phenotypes. Our findings support the hypothesis that students who acquire an understanding of genetic, molecular and cellular evolutionary mechanisms will have a better overall understanding of evolution. <br /><br />We have three goals for this workshop: (i) to model the case-approach to evolution education, (ii) to provide participants with “instruction ready” web-based evolution education materials, and (iii) to disseminate our preliminary investigation that analyzes the impact of the integrative case-approach on the learning of evolution. The education materials we have developed, including PowerPoint slides and web-based simulations (games), are freely available at http://www.evo-ed.com.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Peter White et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Struggling first-year science students – who’s gonna fix them?</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/24</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/24</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Research examining the first-year transition experience demonstrates that students struggle in finding a balance between academic, social and personal demands on their time (McInnis, 2001). This results in a misperception of the amount of work and time required to accomplish academic tasks (Watson et al., 2002). Most institutions attempt to ease this transition by offering a variety of academic and non-academic supplemental programs and services.</p>
<p>When it comes to improving academic skills, another approach that is commonly used is to intentionally integrate these skills into the first-year curriculum. However, these efforts still occur during the period when students are struggling to adapt to their new social and physical environments, and to cope with the psychological and cognitive demands of higher education. A third approach to easing the first-year academic transition is to allow for more practice time between the introduction and the use of a particular academic skill. Since there is limited time available in the university semester, the authors propose an approach to facilitate the development of academic skills within the high school curriculum that is aligned with the skills required during the first year of higher education curriculum.</p>
<p>In this session, participants will explore mechanisms through which university faculty and staff can work together with high school instructors to communicate the post-secondary academic skill expectations of students prior to their entering university. We will also discuss “Who is responsible?” and “How can we introduce university-level academic skills into the high school setting?”</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dale Lackeyram et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Rich Learning Activities:  Engaging Students in Postsecondary Classrooms</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/23</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/23</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Keeping with the conference theme of “Doing More with Less”, the author of <em> Guide to Classroom Engagement</em>, reviews the principles of engaging teaching, and presents a rich menu of simple, practical, user-friendly learning activities that have been demonstrated to enhance student learning, retention, and success. Dr. Fisher’s highly interactive workshop invites audience participation in addressing both the benefits and the challenges of engaging students in post-secondary science classrooms.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Roger Fisher, Professor Emeritus Dr.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>PSEER: New Science Education Research Centre at Guelph</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/22</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/22</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Physical Science and Engineering Education Research Centre (PSEER Centre) has just been established at the University of Guelph. Created as a research centre within the College of Physical and Engineering Science, its mission is to promote research into teaching and learning in the physical and engineering sciences, and to foster improved pedagogical practices in the classroom. Funding has been provided to establish a distinguished science education speaker series, create and fund the position of Science Education Scholar, fund an ongoing research competition for science research programs, establish a science education conference, and advocate for advancement of science education policy, practice, funding, scholarship, and recognition. The first call for research proposals has gone out to the faculty and the first programs should be underway by the time this conference begins. The members look forward to collaboration with their peers throughout the field.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dan Thomas</author>


<category>Other</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Providing Students with More Support and Guidance with Fewer Teaching Assistants</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/21</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/21</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The fourth-year undergraduate course “Peer Tutoring in Chemical Biology” was created in 2009 to provide students with theoretical and practical experience with teaching and mentoring second-year undergraduate chemical biology students enrolled in the “Inquiry for Chemical Biology” course. The peer tutoring course is capped at five students and requires students to submit a written application and subsequently obtain permission from the instructor. The course appeals to senior undergraduate chemical biology students who want to develop/refine their teaching and mentorship abilities, and who genuinely have a passion for helping others. Peer tutors develop and deliver presentations, write self-reflections, discuss assigned readings on a variety of mentoring topics, mark oral and written work, advise students during projects, and most importantly, serve as positive role models for the incoming chemical biology students. Students enrolled in the peer tutoring course are evaluated on their presentations, reflective statements, participation, interaction with students, and on the quality of feedback they provide on oral and written work. The format of the peer tutoring course is not discipline-specific and has the potential to be adapted to a variety of courses and situations. Also, some aspects of the course such as the assigned readings, weekly discussions, and self-reflections could be implemented as training for teaching assistants. The work presented will provide a detailed overview of the peer tutoring course and how it has evolved over the past four years. Advantages of using peer tutors in the course as opposed to teaching assistants will also be discussed.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Nancy McKenzie</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Promoting higher order thinking skills in biology: evaluation of a newly developed course using Bloom’s taxonomy.</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/20</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/20</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We have recently designed and implemented a unique, large (1800 students/year) first year biological concepts of health course (BIOL*1080) aimed at promoting higher order thinking skills and attributes. Our course served as one of three courses that replaced two more traditional biology courses (BIOL*1030 and BIOL*1040) and incorporates seminar, lab and interdisciplinary assignments in an attempt to foster skills in areas such as oral and written communication, critical thinking, and independent learning. To determine if we were successful in designing a course centered on the teaching and assessment of higher order thinking skills, we ranked the course evaluative materials based on Bloom’s taxonomy (Zheng, A.Y., Science 319:414,2008). Bloom’s taxonomy is a hierarchical categorization of knowledge and thinking skills comprised of 6 levels (from lowest to highest): knowledge - 1, comprehension – 2, application – 3, analysis – 4, synthesis – 5, and evaluation – 6. Briefly, each exam question and assignment was scored by a team of 6 individuals with varying degrees of familiarity with the course. Scores per test/assignment were averaged and a weighted average was calculated for the entire course, with a higher weighted average representing assessment of a higher order of thinking. The average bloom level for our course was 3.28±0.15 which was significantly higher than one of the more traditional biology courses (BIOL*1030 – 1.93±0.08 ) but not the second course (BIOL*1040 – 2.95±0.17). The blooming exercise provided a useful metric to assess the level of higher order thinking required for newly developed courses and allowed for comparisons between courses to be objective.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Coral L. Murrant et al.</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Promoting Active Learning in a Large-Enrollment Introductory Science Class: Interactive Lecture Demonstrations With Clickers</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/19</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/19</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In today’s climate of fiscal constrains many university science courses are left without a laboratory component. Lecture demonstrations remain virtually the only vehicle to bring experimentation into large introductory science courses. Unfortunately, just showing the demonstrations during the lectures has very little effect on students’ learning. In order to make a real difference, the lecture demonstrations need to be embedded into students’ activities. Interactive Lecture Demonstrations (ILDs)<sup>1 </sup>method is proven to be very effective in combating students misconceptions. ILDs employ “elicit/confront/resolve” cycle: the students make written predictions before they see a demonstration, and reconcile their ideas with the results of the demonstration once it is completed. However, a valid complain about ILDs is that the predictions need to be recorded and marked for credits. Fortunately, Peer Instruction (PI) pedagogy can be used to support ILDs procedure, where the pre-demo clicker questions are built to collect the predictions about the experiment, and post-demo questions are built to follow up on the results. Although it appears that “clicker ILDs” are not as effective as the ILDs with written predictions, using clicker questions related to the demonstration is an acceptable alternative to the standard ILD procedure, in particular, for large-enrollment classes. This is a work in progress, as sets of matching questions for popular class demos are being developed. Several examples will be provided.</p>
<p>1.D.R. Sokoloff, R.K.Thornton (2006). Interactive Lecture Demonstrations, Active Learning in Introductory Physics, Wiley.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Tetyana Antimirova</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Profile of common misconceptions and retention of genetics concepts in undergraduate biology students</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/18</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/18</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Students often enter a course with a lack of knowledge in a particular area and potentially with misconceptions about the concepts necessary to develop a fundamental understanding of the discipline. A lack of knowledge can be remediated by engaging in learning the course material, but misconceptions can inhibit learning if they are not corrected. In the biology program at the University of British Columbia we have used questions from validated genetics concept assessment tools<sup>1,2</sup> to measure conceptual understanding of students at all levels of the biology program. Our results show that first and second year students hold very similar misconceptions, suggesting that the correction of some of these misconceptions during first year biology is somewhat temporary. Additionally, we report post-course retention of conceptual knowledge in genetics after students complete a second year genetics course in relation to common initial misconceptions. The information collected in this study suggests that students enter first year biology with several, significant misconceptions and that in most cases, at least the equivalent of two semesters of genetics are necessary to replace these misconceptions with correct conceptual understanding. We will discuss our data as well as strategies used to dislodge some misconceptions, and how we are using this information to inform curriculum decisions. Participants will be invited to engage in a discussion on their experiences with misconceptions that are difficult to dislodge in their own fields, as well as approaches used to correct the situation.</p>
<p><sup>1 </sup>Smith, M., Knight, J, and Wood, W. 2008. The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. CBE-Life Sciences Education 7(4): 422-430.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup> Kalas, P., O’Neill, A., Pollock, C., and Birol, G. 2012. Development and Application of a Meiosis Concept Inventory. Submitted for review to Cell Biology Education, Oct 2012.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lisa McDonnell et al.</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>PeerWise: student-generated content for enhanced engagement and learning</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>PeerWise is a free, online system that allows student groups to author, answer, rate and comment on student-generated multiple choice questions. It incorporates social functionality common to many Web2.0 applications. Across multiple courses at several institutions, we have found that its use has produced:  <ul> <li>A large number of high quality student submissions;</li> <li>Enhanced student engagement with course material outside class hours and;</li> <li>Enhanced performance on the end of course examination for the majority of students.</li> </ul></p>
<p>This online workshop will be delivered through Blackboard Collaborate and will present an introduction to PeerWise, together with a significant hands-on activity where attendees will play the role of students creating assessment content, and answering and rating submissions from their colleagues. Attendees will gain a good understanding of the capabilities of the system and the potential it can offer for use in a wide range of sciences courses.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Simon Bates et al.</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Peer Instruction observed in the wild</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/17</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/17</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>'Flipped' or 'inverted classroom' approaches have been shown to enhance the effectiveness of teaching contact time. We have adopted this pedagogy in our introductory physics classes, in which we teach a mixed cohort of around 300 major and non-major students at a large, research-intensive university. A crucial element of class activity is the Peer Instruction methodology, in which students discuss and defend their conceptions of topics, with levels of student understanding gauged using clicker questions. We have studied student behavior during these Peer Instruction sessions using 'smart pen' technology, which allows us to match audio-recorded student conversations and pen strokes with their clicker votes in an unobtrusive way. We find that the large majority of student conversations result in students settling on the correct answer to the post-discussion clicker questions, and that the success of these conversations does not depend on the technical fluency of the students' vocabulary. The smart pen recordings also allow us to assess any problems or ambiguities in the clicker questions themselves, thus affording the opportunity for informed revision of pathological clicker questions. Over two iterations of the class we have successfully modified a number of clicker questions in light of this feedback and find them to have correspondingly increased learning gains. Thus, this authentically-situated 'in the wild' study of student behavior has benefits both in terms of increased theoretical understanding of the instructional approach and also in direct refinement of the classroom resources, i.e. more learning with less confusion.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ross K. Galloway et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More Students Working Together with Less Rote Learning:  Fostering Academic Success in the Sciences with Peer-Led Study Groups for High-Risk Courses</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/16</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/16</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The University of Guelph’s award-winning Supported Learning Groups (SLG) Program offers students weekly, collaborative, out-of-class review sessions for challenging courses on our campus, including numerous 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> year science courses. Based on a well established model of co-curricular academic support used around the world known as Supplemental Instruction (SI), the SLG Program encourages learner-centredness, enhances student engagement, and helps retain students. Come hear about our collaborative approach in which professional staff, instructors, and some of the brightest and most engaged upper-year undergraduates work together to build student competence and confidence in identified courses. These student Peer Helpers are trained to guide students through activities designed to get students working together to review the course content and come to understand it themselves, as well as develop successful study habits and prepare for midterms and finals. The effective use of group facilitation and collaborative learning strategies are our bread and butter – we will interactively involve participants as we describe how the SLG Program engages students with the course content they must master, with more active learning and less rote memorization, and helps them develop transferable learning skills.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Krista Bianco</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More Options, Fewer Students: Joint Physics and Chemistry Courses at Mount Royal University</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/15</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/15</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:45:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Mount Royal University is a new University with only a few majors in the sciences. This limits the number of students interested in chemistry and physics courses and makes it difficult to run advanced courses in these areas. We have responded to this problem by designing joint courses in Thermodynamics, Quantum Mechanics, and Solid State that count for credit as either a chemistry course or a physics course. Students in the courses were interviewed in order to determine whether the difficulty level and balance of topics in the courses was appropriate. This short and tweet will discuss the design decisions and problems with a higher-level multidisciplinary course, as well as some feedback gleaned from student interviews. A newer joint course involving both nuclear science and policy studies will also be described briefly.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Christopher C. Lovallo et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More Feedback With Less Delays: Exploring novel constrained essay questions</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>There is a widely acknowledged tradeoff between evaluation items that are tractable to grade for large numbers of students (e.g. multiple choice questions) and those which provide insight into students higher-order thinking skills and deeper understanding of scientific concepts (i.e. essay questions, performance-based assessments). The latter provide much more information, but are currently difficult or impossible to automatically grade and time-prohibitive to manually grade in large classes. One place among many that this presents problems is in trying to develop open-ended lab experiences for students which can be done in large classes, but still provide students the immediate formative feedback they need in order to learn how to properly do an experiment. Ideally, they would also provide instructors enough summative feedback to target common problems in their classroom.</p>
<p>I'll present a project that is attempting to find a middle ground by taking open-ended assessments and adding constraints that make it possible to automatically categorize student answers. I'll focus on two forms of constrained essay question, which we are calling "LabLibs" and "WordBytes", and show preliminary data that students' answers in these constrained essays capture some of the confusions evident in free response or interview answers. I'll also discuss ways in which we are attempting to constrain other portions of the full experimental cycle within open-ended simulations (focusing on a virtual lab on natural selection) to enable immediate feedback to students. Please bring your computer to play with the tools and simulations yourself.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Eli Meir</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More Engagement, Less Lecturing, with Breakout Groups</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/16</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/16</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>To underscore nutritional issues that are prevalent in healthcare, I encouraged students to interact and draw from their own diet or nutritional preferences in order to reiterate important concepts and aid in retention of course content, as well as to illustrate the generalizable nature of the problem. Aligning with the less is more theme, less lecturing and more time spent discussing and engaging with a topic, my aim was to promote deeper learning and student satisfaction. A series of breakout group exercises<sup>1</sup> were inserted in between lecturing in a third year health science nutrition course for nursing students last fall. These exercises were designed in collaboration with a dietitian, who is part of a family health team, to highlight the issues that are frequently seen in the clinic. Various amounts of time were given to calculate nutrient quantities from a diet log or published nutritional data, depending on the exercise. When the allotted time had elapsed, the students reported their results using i>Clickers. At the end of the course, students were asked to complete a survey about the utility of and their satisfaction with the exercises. This presentation will include an example of one of the exercises, “What’s in Your Drink?”, to engage session participants and illustrate the technique. The talk will also discuss the preliminary findings from the survey and the implications for the use of these exercises in the future.</p>
<p><sup>1</sup><strong> </strong>Justan Lougheed, James Kirkland & Genevieve Newton (2012). Using Breakout Groups as an Active Learning Technique in a Large Undergraduate Nutrition Classroom at the University of Guelph, The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Volume 3, Issue 2.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Teresa (Terry) R. McCurdy</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More Disciplines With Less Course Offerings</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/15</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/15</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Teaching large size classes is becoming the norm in many engineering schools. With these increasing numbers come the traditional challenges such as meeting the educational needs of the students who have various learning styles. At Guelph, we are in the unique position of not only needing to meet the needs of a large number of students, but also to meet the needs of students focusing on different fields of study: being non-departmentalized, students in engineering at Guelph are grouped in common courses regardless of focus of study. This results in, for example, Computer Engineering Students taking the same electric circuits course as those in Environmental Engineering; we therefore find ourselves in the unique position of needing to not only adjust for diversity of learning styles and background knowledge, but also to ensure that each student has the required depth of knowledge to succeed in their future program specific courses. We attempt to address these challenges in a number of ways. To leverage the fact that we have many disciplines in the same room, we use think pair share (via clicker quizzes and problem based lectures) to encourage interaction. In an attempt to draw some of the more reluctant students into the course material, we introduce analogies from other disciplines to make the topic more comfortable (e.g., water analogies to teach circuits) and introduce applications that answer the question “why is this topic relevant to me?” Finally, to address the varying background and future depth requirements, we use simple introductory open labs and tutorials to bring every student up to the same level and provide scaffolded assignment problems to challenge those who will need more depth in later courses while providing more straightforward problems for those who do not.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Soha Moussa et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More Connecting with Less Boundaries: The Ontario Consortium of Undergraduate Biology Educators (oCUBE) Model</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/14</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/14</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Founded in 2009, the Ontario Consortium of Undergraduate Biology Educators (oCUBE) is an enthusiastic community of practice dedicated to enhancing the quality and experience of undergraduate biology education within Ontario universities. This consortium has grown since its inception and now supports knowledge mobilization between educators across 17 Ontario universities and colleges. Educators from diverse fields share best practices related to teaching and learning, discuss common issues such as curriculum innovation, provide supportive mentorship for new, future, and experienced faculty, and collaborate on research projects. Communication occurs via monthly online conferencing meetings, a wiki website, monthly newsletters, one-on-one interactions, and an annual UnConference (1,2). In this workshop, participants will experience the interactive UnConference format that oCUBE uses to facilitate our meetings. We will then engage the participants in an interactive simulation of the oCUBE UnConference model by inviting them to provide and select topics/questions for potential discussion , facilitate brief sessions, and scribe outcomes. By the end of the workshop, we hope that those in attendance will have gained resources that will allow them to implement our oCUBE multi-interactive model in order to facilitate knowledge mobilization and foster professional development.</p>
<p>1. Hamlin, K. Unconference.net, Like a conference only better, <a href="http://www.unconference.net">http://www.unconference.net</a></p>
<p>2. Follett, J. 2006. Understanding the Unconference, <a href="http://www.digital-web.com/articles/understanding_the_unconference/">http://www.digital-web.com/articles/understanding_the_unconference/</a></p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lovaye Kajiura Ph.D. et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More juggling with less struggling: Troublesome concepts ACROSS the sciences</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/14</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/14</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Threshold concepts, first proposed by Meyer and Land in 2003, are considered to be those troublesome concepts that are barriers to progress when learning within a discipline; once mastered, these concepts change our way of thinking in that discipline, and cannot be unlearned. These concepts are also integrative and allow us to link apparently disparate ideas within the field.</p>
<p>Our conversations around teaching and learning in different scientific disciplines have led us to consider the possible existence of threshold concepts that transcend the sciences rather than residing within a single discipline. In this session we will examine a number of these underlying concepts that, until mastered, can present significant hurdles for students’ learning within the sciences. Participants are invited to evaluate some possible threshold concepts for student learning in the sciences from the perspective of their own areas of scientific work, including, but not limited to: identifying contextual constraints; visualizing data and interpreting a variety of visual representations, including diagrams, photos, 3-D representations, maps, and graphs; the notion of randomness; the nature and significance of scale; transitional boundaries; and identifying and making use of evidence. In the process, we hope that additional key concepts will emerge from our discussion. We will then explore what these concepts, and the notion of threshold concepts more generally, might mean for our teaching and for how and what we evaluate.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anne Marie O&apos;Beirne-Ryan Dr et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More integrity and less academic misconduct:  The prevalence of academic misconduct during test re-grading of short and long answer tests</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/13</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/13</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:45:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Many senior level science courses employ short and long answer testing style whereby students can have their test re-graded if they feel they were inaccurately assessed. The integrity of this type of system has been questioned over reports that students may alter their test before handing it back in for re-grading. We designed a study to objectively quantify the prevalence of this type of academic misconduct. Eleven third and fourth year science courses (class sizes: 63-468 students) that used a written testing style and allowed these tests to be re-graded were chosen for the study. All course midterm tests were graded and scanned before they were returned to the students, and then re-scanned if they were submitted for re-grading. The tests were then compared to determine if the answers had been altered. Ethical approval for this study was obtained to allow the study to be performed without informed consent to ensure the validity of the results. Further analysis will determine if there is a correlation between those that cheat and their test grade, their major, and their sex as well as observing how they are cheating. A comprehensive analysis of the all courses will help elucidate the context that incites students to commit academic misconduct. Understanding the prevalence of this cheating strategy, how students supplement their tests and the circumstances that provoke students to cheat will help us determine the integrity of this testing style, and inform us on how to deter this activity in the future.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kristine Ottaway et al.</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>More activity with less passivity:  Take three ideas, blend, and flip!  Sustainability, earth sciences, and critical thinking</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/12</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:45:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A commonly-held premise in the sciences is that in order to “cover the content”, we need to deliver the information to the students in lectures. As a result, we hesitate to allow time during class for students to think and grapple with the ideas, issues, and controversies in the field. When addressing the teaching around sustainability in the context of earth and environmental sciences courses, for example in exploring issues around energy, water, and mining, such discussions and the development of critical thinking are paramount to bringing about a deeper understanding of the issues facing sustainable practices. Students need time to engage in collaborative discussions if they are to begin to really think critically and to truly understand the deeper issues around sustainability, such as dealing with uncertainty and complexity, understanding change through space and time, and recognition of patterns amidst the noise. How might we both cover the content and provide time for active discussion?</p>
<p>Flipping the classroom so that the bulk of the class time is spent discussing and analyzing the content that is presented in a variety of ways either prior to, or in a condensed form at the beginning of class, is a powerful way in which our classrooms can come more alive and more relevant to students. This presentation will examine our evolving classroom role, as we move from “the sage on the stage” to orchestrating and moving forward collaborative discussions so that they encourage critical and reflective thinking across the sustainability-science-society nexus</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anne Marie O&apos;Beirne-Ryan Dr</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Measuring student beliefs, attitudes and dispositions relative to experts in science and mathematics: the C-LASS survey and its derivatives.</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/13</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/13</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>As part of the Science Education Initiatives under the directorship of Carl Wieman at the University of British Columbia (CWSEI) and the University of Colorado at Boulder (CUSEI), a suite of survey instruments has been developed to measure student orientation to expert-like attitudes and dispositions in each of Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Earth Sciences, Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science. The surveys, usually administered online, consist of 35-50 statements each, with a 5-point Likert scale, and may be completed quickly as opinions are measured rather than content knowledge or skills (e.g. "To learn biology, I only need to memorize facts and definitions", "Nearly everyone is capable of understanding math if they work at it."). Students are scored relative to the "expert" response for each statement (i.e. the one chosen by a strong majority of instructors and researchers in the discipline); some early validation found that students were able to identify the expert response choice but would respond with their own opinion as instructed. The result is a quick assessment of attitudes, including motivation and understanding of the nature of the discipline, which are known to be related to learning.</p>
<p>We will present the development process, involving iteration between survey data and statement validation stages with students and experts, as well as findings from the different disciplines in (primarily early) university courses. These include common trends, such as a tendency to see a decrease in overall expert orientation in the first year and alignment of expert attitudes with course performance, as well as some unique disciplinary outcomes. We hope to further discuss the implications for instruction with those who attend.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Joseph Lo et al.</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Maintaining a Positive Learning and Teaching Culture in a Large Introductory Chemistry Course While Moving From a Lecture Teaching Model to a Blended Learning Model.</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/12</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Year 1 classroom is a critical place to create an environment where students feel safe and engaged in the learning process. Creating such an environment, particularly in a large class setting, does not happen by accident. While some instructors may be gifted with skills that naturally allow this to occur, engaging in reflective practice can aid any instructor to evaluate and refine their approach to teaching in order to better support learning.</p>
<p>This discussion will offer an examination, based on reflective practice, of certain current best practices for creating and supporting both a positive teaching culture and a positive learning culture in a large Year 1 lecture-based chemistry course. Aspects will include teaching and learning in the full-class session, the online environment, and in opportunities such as tutorials, laboratories, and smaller group or 1-on-1 interactions within the course.</p>
<p>This will include reflecting on the success of creating an instructional team model for steering the course, and working with a central philosophy of “do more of what works and less of what doesn’t”. Some challenges to be faced as the course moves away from traditional “lecture” sessions to a blended learning format include determining how this team model will evolve, and how learning and teaching may best be supported in a flipped classroom model with less face-to-face time.</p>
<p>These challenges, and strategies for supporting learning in the new blended learning format, will be discussed and participant feedback or sharing of experience on any of the above topics will be welcomed!</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Pippa Lock</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Less Traditional – More Conceptual: Enhancing Student Learning in First-Year Biology</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/11</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Over the last two decades, a number of influential reports have called for fundamental changes to undergraduate science education. Most importantly, these reports advocate a shift from traditional lecture-based teaching formats to ones that use student-focused pedagogies to encourage deep student learning about key conceptual ideas in science. Based on these reports, and the underlying research, the University of Calgary completed an extensive redesign of its first-year biology courses in 2011, resulting in two courses: <em>Energy Flow in Biological</em> <em>Systems</em> and <em>DNA, Inheritance and Evolution.</em> These courses focus student learning on two foundational concepts and use student-centered pedagogies to encourage the development of critical-thinking and problem-solving skills. Pre/post data collected from one year of the previous introductory courses and two years of the redesigned courses were used to determine the impact of the transition to a conceptual-based curriculum and the incorporation of active learning strategies including clickers and in-class group assignments on student learning gains measured via normalized change using questions from Biological Concept Inventory, Respiration and Photosynthesis Diagnostic Question Clusters and the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. Student motivations and approaches for learning (e.g. deep versus surface approaches) using the published Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) survey and the Experiences of Teaching and Learning Questionnaire (ETLQ). Data show significantly higher learning gains during the two consecutive years of implementation of the redesigned courses than those achieved in the previous format. Additionally, students reported that lecture activities allowed them being more engaged with course content. We are currently analyzing student written responses, which will provide further insight into the impact of course redesign on content knowledge and critical reasoning skills on student success.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Cindy M. Graham et al.</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Less time talking at students and more time talking with them: experiences of a neophyte classroom flipper</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/10</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In a traditionally run university science course, the instructor imparts information to students during lectures, and students work on problems outside of class to solidify this knowledge. “Flipping the classroom” refers to the practice of having students acquire information before class, for example from a recorded lecture, and using class time to work interactively with their peers and the instructor on homework-style problems or exercises. In principle, the flipped classroom makes better use of the contact time between instructor and students, because the instructor can provide timely guidance tailored to individual student difficulties.</p>
<p>I tried the flipped classroom strategy in a third-year Biochemistry course with an enrolment of 180 students. In this presentation I will describe how I implemented the strategy using recorded lectures and online assignments coupled with in-class exercises done by students in small groups. Most in-class activities were problems based on experiments published in the scientific literature, although some featured tactile manipulation of objects to illustrate biochemical concepts. Those attending the session will participate in an example of the latter type of exercise, relating to DNA structure. The main lessons I learned from my first attempt to flip the classroom are that running some types of exercises with 150+ students is logistically demanding, and that it is easy to make in-class problems too difficult. I will place my experiences into the context of published work about classroom flipping. Time will be allotted for attendees to share their insights and ideas about strategies for flipping the classroom.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Derek McLachlin</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Learning Task Inventories (LTIs) in Introductory Organic Chemistry</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/9</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>University students who are capable of more accurate self-monitoring and self-assessment usually outperform less accurate students. Instructional support is an important tool that can be provided for learners to help them to understand that they should self-monitor and self-assess as well as how they should do this. To assist students in an introductory organic chemistry course in developing or improving self-monitoring and self-assessment skills, we offered scaffolding support through nine Learning Task Inventories (LTIs), completed weekly throughout one term. A class of 289 students were randomly assigned to one of 5 conditions (1 control = C1, and 4 experimental = E2-E5). Each group experienced a set of LTI conditions that differed with respect to feedback received and cognitive load. Specifically, participants in C1 received the LTIs. Condition E2 received LTIs and a metacognitive prompt. Conditions E3-E5 completed a learning quiz with different types of feedback: E3 received no feedback, E4 received brief feedback (i.e. The correct answer is A), and E5 received full feedback explaining specific answers. Participants also completed an introductory survey gathering important demographic information and an end-of-term survey assessing student reactions to the LTIs. Consistent with expectations, preliminary data support improved learning gains for reported test scores (F<sub>(2.86)</sub> = 4.48 value, p < .02 ), such that students who received full feedback on their quizzes outperformed students who only completed the quiz. This presentation will present the results pertaining to student attitudes and the effects of treatment conditions on final exam grades.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Stephen L. MacNeil et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Learning Mathematics within an Interdisciplinary Science Program</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/8</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>*** University’s Interdisciplinary Science (iSci) program has been designed to “put into practice many of the innovative concepts linking science education and science research” with the aim to present a “holistic view of science through the interaction between various science disciplines.” This four-year program “provides students with an opportunity to specialize in a selected discipline including chemistry, biology, mathematics, physics, […].” In the first year of the iSci program, within a single course (which carries 80% of the full first-year course load) students study five science subjects (mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and earth science). I have been teaching mathematics in the iSci program since its inception. Going beyond anecdotes and personal experiences, I have been asking myself — What is the impact of this interdisciplinary approach on learning mathematics? Do students know and understand mathematics better? In what sense are they different from the students who do not have similar experiences? These questions (and others) helped me form a research goal — to determine whether (or not) the rich environment within the iSci program enhances learning mathematics, both in terms of content knowledge (functions of one variable, power series and differential equations) and skills (formation of a precise mathematical argument, problem-solving, communication of scientific ideas, etc.). I plan to discuss results and analyze students’ replies to the survey I conducted, which lead to some (perhaps) surprising conclusions.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Miroslav Lovric</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Less stress, more modeling: New classroom approaches</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/11</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Two different senior level seminar courses (Neuroscience and Health and Disease) were used to examine how to effectively create and evaluate the effectiveness of a "see one, do one, teach one" model of critical thinking in senior level courses. Rather than solely posting assignment guidelines, one hour of class time (whether online or in-class) was devoted to providing a model for each type of critical thinking component (presentation or written) prior to the assignment deadline. After observing an example of an assignment by the course instructor ("see one"), students were then required to do the same assignment using their own papers and assessed for levels of satisfaction and stress. Within the “teach one” phase, after the assignments were finished, both online peer evaluations and self-reflection practices demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach on multiple levels. Lastly, surveys of student satisfaction demonstrated that having more in-class models lead to less stress on assignments, particularly when the course instructor was involved in modeling the assignment prior to student evaluations.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Bill Ju</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Kool, Kool, Kool-Aid Soap!</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In this hands-on workshop, we will explore a novel method of making an attractively coloured and scented soap. We will use the traditional lye and lard method of making the soap, but rather than salting out the soap, we will make a complexed version of the crude soap using sodium carbonate. We will then convert the crude soap to a translucent, coloured and scented glycerine soap using a mixture of ethanol, water and glycerine. The colour and scent will be provided by adding appropriate amounts of Kool-Aid<sup>TM</sup> thus giving participants the opportunity to individualize the scent and colour of their soap. Participants will be able to leave with their own soap cake that can be actually be used as well as the recipe. Ideas for the presentation of the soap will be offered as well. The complexation of the crude soap and the use of Kool-Aid<sup>TM</sup> as a colouring and scenting agent make this technique novel. At the University level, this experiment highlights acid/base chemistry, the concept of saponification, simple concepts in organic chemistry, stoichiometry and physical principles of the materials involved. This particular demonstration is ideal as it can be effected by teachers at any level, even in schools, to demonstrate the ancient techniques of soap-making combined with the safe and careful use of chemical materials that are readily available. It serves to show students the practical nature of chemistry and its relevance to our daily lives. It is a great way to illustrate to students how we can do so much more with so little!</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Rashmi Venkateswaran</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Integrating Writing in a Large Undergraduate Science Course</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Written assignments are usually not incorporated into large undergraduate courses due to the significant amount of time and resources their administration requires. Our presentation will reveal how we addressed these challenges for our written assignment in a large (1800 students) first-year undergraduate biology course. Our students write a proposal, receive feedback from their teaching assistant, and submit a revised proposal. We will discuss how we designed and administer the assignment, how it is scaffolded into the laboratories associated with the course, and how we train over 30 course TAs. Additionally, we will explore how we have measured the effect of this assignment on students’ writing and their scientific reasoning, using both student surveys and quantitative methods.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jill Wheeler et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Information Literacy in undergraduate research: transforming an old idea into a new environment.</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/7</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><strong>Elizabeth Braaksma</strong>,<strong> Vera Armann-Keown</strong>,<strong> and Michele Piercey-Normore.</strong></p>
<p>Undergraduate research has historically been an integral component of the educational experience in the Faculty of Science at the University of Manitoba, but rapidly changing science-related disciplines pose unique challenges to identify, evaluate, acquire, and use information. Students are required to demonstrate competency in research papers and conduct laboratory research. Information is scrutinized by anonymous reviewers and is exposed to ethical and legal ramifications. A model was developed to implement information literacy (IL) into existing programs that already have a strong research foundation using the ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries) standards for Science and Engineering. The model aligns both sets of learning outcomes (information literacy and discipline-specific), and provides sample exercises with rubrics for evaluation. The integration of IL learning outcomes within the context of a discipline in which the student has an interest, enables a more powerful learning environment than if the outcomes were separated. The program ensures the five IL competency standards are met at each level of a four-year degree, and that students take responsibility for their own success resulting in greater retention throughout their programs and into their future careers. The implications are that the IL integration will provide the tools necessary to help students remain within and successfully complete their academic programs; and gain added value to their knowledge and skills that can be extended into society or to a graduate degree and beyond.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michele D. Piercey-Normore</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Increasing Engagement and Understanding Using Interactive Planetarium Shows</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/6</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Despite the popularity of astronomy in first year university, it has lagged behind many other disciplines in implementing modern pedagogical techniques designed to improve student engagement. To address this, over the past several years, the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics at our university has employed an Audience Response System, the use of online interaction tools such as Twitter and MSN, the introduction of tutorials which include small-group activities, and the use of a planetarium with which we developed both instructor-led and student-led shows. Our goal in this study was to assess the effectiveness of the overall approach on students’ engagement and understanding, with a specific focus on the use of teaching planetaria. Data was collected using quantitative pre and post test questionnaires at three different stages of the course simultaneously during the tutorial and both types of planetarium shows. We also conducted 5 focus groups with approximately 10 participants in each to evaluate their perspectives on the various learning components of the course and how these influenced their engagement. Although analysis is not complete, quantitative data appears to demonstrate no significant knowledge or understanding differences between the various learning experiences. In focus groups, participants claimed to prefer teacher-directed activities such as class lecture and the tutorial to the student-led planetarium show, although several factors qualified these claims. Results are discussed in the context of literature that theorises contemporary schools are reproducing ‘knowledge consumers’ rather than knowledge producers, and the various economic and social factors influencing this.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Darren G. Hoeg Mr.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>High Engagement in Science Megacourses</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/5</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Large courses are often said to be bad for learning, offering few opportunities for meaningful interaction between instructors and students. In four years of teaching the largest astronomy course in Canada, with up to 1400 students, this has not been my experience. Moreover, I have yet to see compelling evidence that class size alone is a primary determinant of student success, within the range of plausible university class sizes. Instead, I will suggest that creative teaching techniques can make a large class just as effective as a small one. I will argue that our role as teacher is as much to inspire students to learn on their own as it is to transmit knowledge directly. Using examples from a massive introductory astronomy course for non-science majors, I will demonstrate techniques for making courses with hundreds of students feel intimate and connected, keeping students engaged in the learning process and motivated to manage their own learning.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael Reid</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>How to Make Classes, Tutorials and Lab Manuals Stretch Further-A Look at Echo 360!</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/10</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Students today often find first year university to be a vastly different experience than high school. Lectures move at a frightening pace and chapters are finished before students have had a chance to open the book. Students are playing catch-up and hence tutorial sessions are often not as helpful as we might like them to be. If students have not absorbed the material from a previous chapter sufficiently to be able to do problems, they will likely not attend a tutorial on problem-solving for the next chapter. As instructors, if we fall behind, we feel as if we are disadvantaging students, yet if we go ahead, we are not helping them learn. How can we address this perennial dichotomy? One useful tool is Echo 360. It provides a method to record class sessions, tutorial sessions, and even allows for the upload of small sessions of 5-10 min. Echo 360 allows students to view or review material at their OWN pace and to study problem-solving when they are ready to do so. It also allows instructors to provide just in time teaching (JITT) sessions to students on an as-needed basis. In this session, I will discuss some of the ways Echo 360 has been used at the University of Ottawa in general, and in particular in teaching introductory chemistry. The session will be interactive with plenty of occasion for discussion and questions.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Rashmi Venkateswaran</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Graduate students as major drivers of an education initiative</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/9</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Tomlinson Project in University-Level Science Education (T-PULSE) hires graduate students who are deeply integrated in its structure. Science education organizations use graduate students to perform a range of tasks but the vital position and great deal of autonomy that T-PULSE’s Science Teaching Fellows is essential to its existence and woven into its structure.</p>
<p>Fellows determine much of the content of the unit’s projects and present workshops themselves, allowing for peer-to-peer interactions. They also have a large amount of freedom in more personalized projects that they wish to initiate and carry out. This leads to projects being developed due to needs perceived by those on the ground and also creates a group of science graduate students with a great deal of experience in the field of science education by the time they graduate: the program is as much an investment in these students as it is in the projects that they work on during their time at T-PULSE. It allows them to transcend discipline-specific limits and obtain a much greater knowledge of science education than is typical for science graduate students.</p>
<p>The turnover of graduate students as they finish their degrees requires a semi-regular hiring process in which group cohesion is a key factor. T-PULSE's Fellows have a large amount of freedom and responsibility for graduate students, allowing T-PULSE the advantage of different perspectives and approaches as a science education initiative. This flatter setup is scale- and mandate-limited but can be extremely useful.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Torsten Bernhardt</author>


<category>Other</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>From Face-to-Face to Online: Less Transferring, More Transforming</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july11/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Online learning is changing education as we know it. According to Dr. Tony Bates, growth in online learning is expected to increase by 20 to 40 percent this year, and by 90 percent in the next five years. Bates sees this growth as being quickest and most in-depth in Canada. Furthermore, the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities has proposed a need to increase access through technology and innovation and stressed the need for new and flexible approaches to learning and teaching. The question now is: how? How are faculty supposed to meet the above demands?</p>
<p>The common response to this question has been to transfer current face-to face course materials into a Learning Management System (LMS). This is generally being done by the uploading of class resources such as PDFs of course readings or PowerPoint presentations used with lectures. Unfortunately, that is not an effective way to teach online. As well, this mere transference is also ignoring the opportunity to finally improve the way we teach.</p>
<p>I think when Dr. Bates asks "is there major room for improvement in how we teach?” he is encouraging us to consider improving our teaching through including more active learning techniques, more student engagement, more visual content, etc. The online learning environment is very conducive to these improvements. Rather than passively transferring current face-to-face course material to the online LMS, my presentation will offer faculty practical ideas and examples of how to actively transform their current course material so that it is effective in an online learning environment.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Yasmien Mills</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Give them time to think: more learning with less listening</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/8</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>There are many strategies for increasing student engagement. One method that is called "think-pair-share", where students are invited to think about a problem (think), then discuss it with their neighbours (pair), and finally present their solution to the instructor and the rest of the class (share). We have adapted this strategy for use with large chemistry lectures (intro and organic), where the method is throughout the class lecture. Therefore, there is less listening to the course instructor and more time engaged in peer-learning. This presentation will describe this method for increasing engagement in large classes.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Craig D. MacKinnon</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Examining Exams: What Makes For A Good Question?</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/4</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Perhaps the most important task confronting educators is the accurate assessment of student learning. All efforts at reform or innovation must ultimately address the question “Has student learning improved?”. In addition, the movement towards individualized learning must be able to answer the question “Has THIS student’s learning improved?” These questions will require that as educators, we develop the tools and the expertise to critically evaluate our assessment instruments. Large first-year science classes permit the application of learning measurement theories that are at the leading edge of cognitive and educational science. At the University of Guelph, first year Chemistry has approximately 2400 students who complete several multiple choice exams throughout the year in principally two courses. When a student’s grade is calculated at the end of the year, what should that grade mean? A careful study of exam questions using modern learning measurement theories begins to inform the process of exam creation and interpretation. Classical Test Theory (CTT) is commonly used to analyze the performance of both students and exam questions, but this older theory has several well-known weaknesses. Item Response Theory (IRT) is better suited to effectively characterizing the performance of both exam questions and students. I will present data on the analysis of exam questions used at Guelph over the past several years to understand the features that lead to better measures of student learning. Future pedagogical changes will be more readily accessed with these measurement tools.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dan Thomas</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Enhancing post-secondary student experience with science outreach</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/3</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The best way to learn is to teach others. That’s why Let’s Talk Science Outreach Program supports 3300 volunteers in 38 post-secondary institutions across Canada in visiting classrooms to lead quality hands-on, minds-on science learning with children and youth using real-world examples that bring science to life. While increasing science literacy to young people, Let’s Talk Science volunteers develop a suite of skills including communication, teaching, organization, leadership, and management. Volunteers often comment that doing science outreach allows them to solidify the most important concepts, explain their discipline to a greater extent and reminds them of the importance of their research. A growing trend is to recognize the value and importance of extra-curricular activities on student transcripts and Let’s Talk Science activities have been approved in every case that they have been submitted for approval. Let’s Talk Science will discuss the importance of using science outreach as an essential piece of science learning at the university level to develop these important skills, enhancing the student experience for undergraduate and graduate students, and how you can encourage and promote such opportunities.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Glenda Casimir</author>


<category>Other</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Exploring Pathways to the Development of New Degree Majors within Undergraduate Science Education</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/7</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Over the past decade two new majors have been developed within the Bachelor of Science degree program at the University of Guelph; they are B.Sc. Nanoscience (NANO) and B.Sc. Nutritional and Nutraceutical Sciences (NANS). Both majors were developed in response to a rapid increase in basic research in the respective areas, and a corresponding dramatic increase in commercial activity that resulted, partially, from those basic research discoveries. Faculty members at the University of Guelph, intrigued by the new fields, designed and offered graduate courses on the topics.</p>
<p>Nanoscience and nanotechnology are emerging as new ways to examine complex phenomena that require a perspective view simultaneously from the more traditional disciplines of Chemistry, Physics and Biology. The research first grew out of the subfields of condensed matter physics, surface science, macromolecular chemistry, and cellular physiology.</p>
<p>Nutraceutical science is an emergent branch of food, nutritional, pharmacologic and health sciences that recognizes that food has an impact on human health that is greater than providing essential nutrients and energy. Bioactive chemicals in foods and food supplements have the capacity to provide a medicine-like function, altering the risk of a variety of chronic degenerative diseases.</p>
<p>The explosive growth of the new fields caused us to reflect upon the appropriateness of studying these interdisciplinary fields directly at the undergraduate level. We will compare and contrast the very different approaches to the subsequent development of these two undergraduate majors, with an emphasis on key decisions that shaped curriculum design.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>William J. Bettger et al.</author>


<category>Curriculum</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Evaluation with Collaboration</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/6</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Collaboration is a technique used to promote deep learning but it is not often associated with evaluation. An article in “The Teaching Professor” newsletter led me to a study using a collaborative evaluation technique<sup>1</sup>. I’ve adapted this technique for use in a first year biochemistry tutorial for nursing students, with much success. The exercise allows students to answer a multiple choice quiz on their own, then discuss the questions in a group with the opportunity to change their answers after the discussion. Along with individual answers, students are able to assign a confidence value to their answers. Their final grade, marked by switching papers with another group, reflects the confidence they assigned to their answer. Papers are returned to their owners after marking and teaching assistants give immediate feedback on rationale behind both correct and incorrect answers. Anecdotal evidence (via personal conversations with students) highlights that the exercise allows students to identify learning gaps/misconceptions, promotes integration of content and provides a high level of student satisfaction. This short session will discuss the technique along with the pedagogical theories behind its development and adaption.</p>
<p>Under 140 character conclusion:</p>
<p>Collaborative testing exercise promotes integration, deep learning and student satisfaction</p>
<p><sup>1</sup>Erica J. Sainsbury & Richard A. Walker (2008): Assessment as a vehicle for learning: extending collaboration into testing, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33:2,103-117</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Teresa (Terry) R. McCurdy</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Educational Guided Networks Helping Students Transition from Undergraduate to Graduate Programs</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/5</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The purpose of the Educational Guided Network (EGN) is to facilitate an optimal environment for beginning graduate students to continue their education. One of the milestone events in establishing the EGN is a topical symposium, which allows students and faculty to form the connections that facilitate the student’s career path. Since 2011, the scientific focus of EGN has been neuroimmunology. During the two years the EGN has been in existence, three universities chose to participate in this innovation (McGill University, Concordia University and Universite of Sherbrooke). EGN involved 10 faculty members and about 100 students over the two years. In 2011, 4 of the EGN students formed a career path with EGN participating faculty. In 2012-2013 one EGN student from Cocncordia University choose to pursue PhD level studies with the EGN member form the University of Sherbrooke. EGN undertook to provide unique cell culture training for this student at McGill University. The EGN is planning to expand the venue of the annual meeting by including sessions with government workers and industrial partners. The EGN intends to organize the mini-symposia on diverse scientific topics to involve students and faculty with various scientific interest and expertise. It is conceived to broaden the student’s perspective of the future employment and education possibilities. EGN plans to involve industrial partners in organization of stipends and scholarships. The EGN is looking to expand to encompass universities and industrial partners outside of Quebec to better facilitate integration of postgraduate students into academic and industrial establishments across Canada</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Pavel Gris Dr.</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Educating Science Students About Education</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/4</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This past year saw the first offering of an upper-year course titled “Principles and Practices in Science Education”, resulting from an ad-hoc committee representing the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) departments within the university. Aimed at STEM students, this course provides a broad introduction to science education and public outreach, both in and outside of the traditional classroom. Counting as a credit towards the social sciences breadth requirement for STEM program students, participants are exposed to various aspects of educational theory, science curriculum, pedagogy, pitfalls, and practical considerations whether teaching in a classroom, preparing displays and activities, or promoting science through the media. This presentation will discuss how the course came into existence, outline the curriculum, and describe the highs and lows of its first iteration. If you have ever considered running such a course at your institution, you will want to come to this presentation; if you have run such a course at your institution, you are wanted at this presentation! Come and be a part of this educational experiment in science education.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David C. Stone</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Deconstructing the Large Lecture Environment Through Technology</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The large lecture hall may be an efficient way to use instructors to present content to a large population of students but few would argue that this is the best pedagogical design for learning. This talk describes the use of technology to deconstruct a large introductory science class at the University of Michigan Ann-Arbor into a mix of simultaneous face-to-face, synchronous remote and asynchronous remote participation. The goal of this exercise was to study how the environment the student chose affected their level of engagement, attentiveness and learning.</p>
<p>Student surveys showed somewhat surprisingly that the use of laptops in class increased their engagement and attentiveness. The students’ engagement was similar regardless whether the student physically came to class or participated synchronously from remote location. The conclusion reached was that if we can provide tools that empower students to actively participate in class they will, and they will feel more engaged regardless where they participate.</p>
<p><strong>Participants are encouraged to bring a laptop or mobile devices to class to participate in this presentation.</strong></p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Perry Samson</author>


<category>Education Technologies and Innovative Resources</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Biotechnology literacy: Assessing the knowledge and attitudes of student teachers</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/2</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In modern society, science and technology have become key fields affecting the daily lives of all citizens. Furthermore, young people will need this new knowledge in their future careers and in their daily lives as members of a technologically-imbued society. Developing a level of biotechnology literacy across Canadian society may become an essential factor in future prosperity. Teachers need a high level of this literacy to foster students’ development of this competency.</p>
<p>This paper is based on preliminary results from an international survey in Canada, China, and Spain. The survey aims to better understand the knowledge and attitudes of student teachers towards biotechnology which could potentially reflect on their teaching in the future; in other words their level of biotechnology literacy. The validated survey was administered to intermediate/senior and primary/junior pre-service students in the Faculty of Education. Canadian survey results for the primary/junior pre-service students are compared with those in the intermediate/senior program. These results will be compared to those obtained in other countries.</p>
<p>Since biotechnology is having an ever increasing impact on society, this research will provide insight into the extent pre-service education programs need to be expanded and re-developed in order to incorporate and address the growing need for such knowledge.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>John Barnett PhD et al.</author>


<category>Other</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Biochemistry as a Liberal Art</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july10/1</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>One now routinely learns of a university theatre department closed here, a philosophy department closed there, of budget pressure that has forced the cancellation of this language program, or how funding cutbacks have permitted that fine arts department to continue to function, but only with sessional faculty. The sciences (of course?) have been largely spared. But how ought science faculty to respond to the philosophical questions involved in the cultural squeeze on their colleagues? Herein I argue that science faculty ought to be as outraged as they are: what is at stake is the cultural understanding of the meaning and purpose of <em>all</em> education. Will the university devolve into an institution whose purpose is entirely vocational in character? Probably most students already regard it as such, as do some faculty. Using examples from my own discipline – biochemistry – I develop the thesis that to increase emphasis on the epistemological, cosmological, natural historical, and humanistic elements of science disciplines is a defense of education as more-than-training, a partial corrective to the erosion of the liberal arts tradition, and, indeed, an enrichment of the science curriculum itself.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David M. Morgan</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Comparing post-course retention of conceptual and procedural knowledge in genetics</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/2</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A strong indicator of learning is the retention of knowledge after a course is complete. Here we report differences in retention of conceptual versus procedural knowledge after students completed a second year Fundamentals of Genetics course at the University of British Columbia. Students who took the course showed significant retention of conceptual knowledge approximately two and a half months after course completion. However, their ability to solve problems using their conceptual understanding was significantly diminished. With information about retention we can make informed decisions about how much time to devote to teaching various concepts and procedural skills. As well, conceptual knowledge and skills that are valued in biology should likely be taught multiple times over the course of a degree to ensure sufficient long term retention of such knowledge.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lisa McDonnell et al.</author>


<category>Evaluation of Learning</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>Beyond degree requirements and the apprenticeship model: the need for a “third approach” for training biomedical graduate students and postdocs</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wcse/WCSEThirteen/july09/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The current model of training for graduate students and postdocs in the biomedical sciences often focuses on producing research scientists. This model has recently been challenged due to the realities of the job market, sparking many calls for changes to graduate training. We hypothesized that there is a need for additional training in research and career skills for graduate students and postdocs. 201 participants completed an online survey to assess the perceived needs of trainees and Principal Investigators (PIs) in research training and career development. We found that there was a strong desire for additional training in specific aspects of research, with trainees expressing higher interest in additional training compared to PIs (p < 0.01). PIs and trainees had similar priorities when they were asked to select their top three initiatives. We detected an inverse correlation between year of study in a PhD program and level of perceived career preparedness. We asked trainees to indicate their interest in a list of common careers paths and found that academic and research careers were most appealing to trainees. Our data demonstrates that there is a need for a third approach to training in addition to formal degree requirements and the training obtained through the apprenticeship model at work in biomedical laboratories.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Claire Trottier et al.</author>


<category>Teaching and Learning Science</category>

</item>




<item>
<title>&quot;Radiant Imperfection&quot;: The Interconnected Writing Lives of Robert Bringhurst, Dennis Lee, Tim Lilburn, Don McKay, and Jan Zwicky</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1276</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1276</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[<br>
	</br>
	<p>Over the course of the past two decades, Robert Bringhurst, Dennis Lee, Tim Lilburn, Don McKay, and Jan Zwicky have come to be known as a coterie of ecological writers and ethicists. All five poets have inhabited the Canadian university at various points throughout their careers, and by discussing their ecopoetics in light of their commentary on academic epistemologies and contemporary education in the humanities, this dissertation observes how the poets’ respective approaches to aesthetics, philosophy, and pedagogy are intimately intertwined. By contextualizing the group’s ecopoetics in light of their academic interventions, I argue that their public reputations as ecological artists and educators have been established as they have worked to define the borders of their own poetics within and against the territories of the broader academic and literary traditions they inhabit. In this regard, I explore two of the major epistemological traditions that the poets set in contrast to the reading practices of postmodernism – phenomenology, and the <em>via negativa</em> (negative way) – and argue that engaging with their works means continuously renegotiating the age-old question of poetry’s capacity to teach and delight.</p>

	<br>
	</br>]]>
</description>

<author>Kostantina Northrup</author>


<program>English</program>
<degree>Doctor of Philosophy</degree>
</item>




<item>
<title>Through the Carnival Looking Glass: A Carnivalesque Reading of Bruno Schulz&apos;s A Street of Crocodiles and Guy Davenport&apos;s A Table of Green Fields</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1275</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1275</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[<br>
	</br>
	<p>Bruno Schulz’s <em>A Street of Crocodiles </em>(1934)<em> </em>and Guy Davenport’s <em>A Table of Green Fields </em>(1993) feature a collection of short stories and events that occur within the realm of dream and nightmare. Their stories transgress the boundaries of fiction and reality, and do not adhere to traditional literary forms of narrative. They present worlds where all inhibitions are let loose, and allow for the expression and pursuit of desires that would normally be hindered by societal hierarchies and moral codes. A carnival reading of the texts, based on Bakhtin’s theory of the carnival as literary genre, allows for an active engagement between reader and text, and provides a better understanding of the dreams, fears, and desires expressed within each respective work.</p>

	<br>
	</br>]]>
</description>

<author>Tamara A. Kowalski</author>


<program>Comparative Literature</program>
<degree>Master of Arts</degree>
</item>




<item>
<title>Storied Truths: Contemporary Canadian and Indigenous Childhood Trauma Narratives</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1274</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1274</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[<br>
	</br>
	<p>This dissertation reconceptualizes generic distinctions between fiction and testimony in accounts of childhood trauma. Scholars such as Leigh Gilmore have argued that while writers of trauma stories are burdened by legalistic definitions of evidence and anxieties about truth-telling, they nonetheless push at the limits of autobiography, often scuffing the border between fact and fiction, in their effort to bring their traumatic stories into language. There has not, however, been a sustained effort to understand and legitimize the place of <em>fiction</em> in testimony, particularly in cases of adult narrations of recovered memories of childhood traumas. My research addresses this lacuna by querying the dynamic relationship between fiction and testimony in both autobiographical and fictional accounts of childhood trauma. This work is motivated by my desire to open up a scripto-therapeutic space for trauma survivors to incorporate stories and use their imaginations to narrate <em>traumatic truths </em>rather than strictly evidentiary truths.</p>
<p>In Chapter One of my dissertation, I explore Sylvia Fraser’s <em>My Father’s House </em>(1987), a pioneering memoir of recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse. I consider this controversial work as a case history of testimony caught between fact and fiction. Chapter Two extends my discussion of the controversy over the truth-status of Fraser’s traumatic memoir to an analysis of the ways in which three Canadian novels similarly challenge conventional boundaries of genre and representation in their fictional articulation of recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Ann-Marie MacDonald’s <em>Fall on Your Knees </em>(1996), Shani Mootoo’s <em>Cereus Blooms at Night </em>(1996), and Gail Anderson-Dargatz’s <em>The Cure for Death by Lightning</em> (1996). In Chapter Three, I argue that Indigenous writers specifically employ fiction and storytelling as forms of testimony outside of sanctioned Western discursive arenas such as courtrooms and the media. This chapter explores three residential school narratives: Vera Manuel’s play, <em>Strength of Indian Women</em> (1998),<em> </em>and two novels, James Bartleman’s <em>As Long as the Rivers Flow</em> (2011)<em> </em>and Robert Arthur Alexie’s <em>Porcupines and China Dolls</em> (2002)<em>.</em></p>

	<br>
	</br>]]>
</description>

<author>Michelle Coupal</author>


<program>English</program>
<degree>Doctor of Philosophy</degree>
</item>




<item>
<title>Realism, Really?:  A Closer Look at Theories of Realism in Cinema</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/10</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:40 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Timothy John Edwards</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Cinematic Potentialities and The Student of Prague (1913)</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/9</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:40 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Matt Rossoni</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>The Hole: Diasporic Cinema and the Ontology of Absence</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/8</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:39 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Erin Nunoda</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>A Discussion of Contemporary Latin American Cinema:  The Maid/La Nana</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/7</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:38 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Ross Hamilton</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Bigger Fish to Fry: The Global Appeal of Eat Drink Man Woman</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/6</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:38 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Samantha Roach</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>We Rob Banks: The Influence of 1960s Counterculture on New Hollywood Film</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/5</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:37 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Alissa Chater</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Why They Wear the Mask: The Mouthpieces of Nolan’s Batman Trilogy</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/4</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Brent Holmes</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Feminizing Masculinity</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Katie Wilks</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>The Disturbing Art of Sight and Sound in Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/2</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>David Lavrencic</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>An Inquest into Surrealism: L&apos;Étoile de Mer and the Quest for Surreality</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/kino/vol4/iss1/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:45:34 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Jesse Brossoit</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Origins of stable isotopic variations in Late Pleistocene horse enamel and bone from Alberta</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1273</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1273</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 10:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[<br>
	</br>
	<p>Oxygen and carbon isotopic measurements of coevally formed bone and tooth enamel bioapatite from a modern equid show that these tissues record drinking water and diet isotopic signals in an identical fashion. Hence, data for both tissues can be combined to track movement, dietary changes, and seasonal variability over the animal’s lifetime, and climatic variability over longer time periods. This tool was tested for horses using ten paired tooth and bone samples to reconstruct conditions in Alberta during the Late Pleistocene. While <em>post-mortem</em> isotopic alteration confounded interpretation of the results, two key findings emerged: (i) pre- and post-Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) time periods based on radiocarbon dates correspond with high and low δ<sup>15</sup>N collagen values, respectively; and (ii) pre- and post-LGM horses have similar drinking water δ<sup>18</sup>O and diet δ<sup>13</sup>C values, suggesting that environmental conditions, including seasonality, were similar across the time periods represented by these samples.</p>

	<br>
	</br>]]>
</description>

<author>Nicolle S. Bellissimo</author>


<program>Geology</program>
<degree>Master of Science</degree>
</item>




<item>
<title>Characterizing the contribution of the LXCXE binding cleft to pRB-mediated genome stability and tumor suppression</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1272</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1272</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[<br>
	</br>
	<p>Condensation and segregation of mitotic chromosomes are critical processes for cellular propagation and if compromised, can lead to genomic instability. Genomic instability is known to be an active contributor to tumorigenesis, rather than being a by-product of malignant progression. The retinoblastoma protein (pRB) is the prototypic tumor suppressor. Its tumor suppressive properties are linked to its ability to negatively regulate proliferation by inhibiting E2F target gene transcription. Using a gene targeted mouse model defective for interactions mediated by the pRB LXCXE binding cleft that is distinct from E2F binding (<em>Rb1<sup>ΔL/ΔL</sup></em>), I have demonstrated that LXCXE-interactions are an essential part of pRB-mediated tumor suppression. When these interactions are disrupted, cells exhibit chromosome condensation and mitotic defects that are unrelated to G1 to S-phase regulation by pRB. These defects contribute to earlier tumor formation and more aggressive pathology in <em>Trp53<sup>+/-</sup></em> and <em>Trp53<sup>-/-</sup></em> mouse models, revealing a new mechanism of tumor suppression, facilitated by pRB, whereby genome stability is maintained by the proper condensation of mitotic chromosomes. Subsequent study of the mechanism by which pRB facilitates genome stability suggests that a pRB-E2F1-Condensin II complex localizes to pericentromeric heterochromatin. In the absence of this complex, DNA double strand breaks are observed and persist into mitosis and the ensuing G1 phase of the cell division cycle. Moreover, haploinsufficiency of <em>Rb1</em> was enough to compromise loading of Condensin II at pericentromeric DNA and elicit the same defects. Significantly, <em>RB1<sup>+/-</sup></em> fibroblasts from retinoblastoma patients also exhibit DNA damage and mitotic errors. And, in cancers of mesenchymal origin, <em>RB1<sup>+/-</sup></em> cells exhibit as much genomic instability as <em>RB1<sup>-/-</sup></em> cells. Finally, haploinsufficiency of the LXCXE binding cleft of pRB compromises pRB-mediated tumor suppression, resulting in tumors with increased chromosome gains and losses, comparable to <em>Rb1</em><em><sup>ΔL/ΔL</sup></em> mutant mice. The data presented in this thesis change our understanding of the importance of genome stability as a tumor suppressive mechanism of the retinoblastoma protein and contrary to traditional thought, suggests that haploinsufficiency of <em>RB1</em> functionally contributes to tumorigenesis in humans.</p>

	<br>
	</br>]]>
</description>

<author>Courtney H. Coschi</author>


<program>Biochemistry</program>
<degree>Doctor of Philosophy</degree>
</item>




<item>
<title>Review of Canadian University Fair Dealing Policies</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fimspub/26</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fimspub/26</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:25:43 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The past three years have seen a number of changes in the area of copyright law, particularly in the area of education. As a result, Canadian universities have had to make policy decisions to account for these changes and the resulting expansion of fair dealing rights. The content and consistency of the resulting policies may have a significant effect on the future interpretation of fair dealing rights. In this paper I analyze the current state of fair dealing policies and supporting information found on university web sites. I conclude that an ideal fair dealing policy is open ended and flexible, and incorporates mention of the significant elements of copyright legislation, court decisions, and other areas of law, in a way that is accessible to its intended audience of faculty and instructors.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lisa Di Valentino</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Unhappy Speech, and Hearing Well: Feminist Phenomenology and Feminist Speech Act Theory</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/8</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Unfortunately Dr. Stawarska is unable to be with us, but we want to share the abstract for the research she has prepared to present.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Beata Stawarska</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Hannah Arendt’s Concept of Uniqueness and the Discourse of Authentic Leadership</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/7</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Rita Gardiner</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Feminist Phenomenology and Democratic Citizenship</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/6</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:50:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Marieke Borren</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Illness, Voice, and Intersubjectivity</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/5</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Linda Fisher</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Sovereign Masculinity and the Problem of Justification in Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/4</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Bonnie Mann</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>If Descartes Menstruated . . . A Post-Beauvoirean Note</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/3</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:50:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Kyoo Lee</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Transformative Phenomenology: Deleuze’s Lines of Flight</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/2</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Lyat Friedman</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Future Directions and Feminist Phenomenology</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Saturday/1</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:50:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Helen Fielding</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Body Talk I: Habituation to Bodily Changes After Breast Surgery in Women</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/8</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Jenny Slatman</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Body Talk II: Narratives of the Body</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/7</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:20:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Annemie Halsema</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Feminist Bio-phenomenology</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/6</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Christina Schües</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Hannah Arendt and Pregnancy in the Public Sphere</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/5</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Katy Fulfer</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Crafting Contingency</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/4</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:20:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Rachel McCann</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>The Power of Hesitation:  Interrupting Racializing Habit and Rethinking Agency</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Alia Al-Saji</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Identity-in-Difference</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/2</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:20:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Emily S. Lee</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Hyper-dialectic: Methodological Considerations for an Ontological Feminist Phenomenology</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Friday/1</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:20:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Eva-Maria Simms</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>A Phenomenological-Existential Understanding of Our Being-in-the-World: Intersubj(obj)ectivity</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Christine Daigle</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Beauvoir, Irigaray, and the Ambiguities of Desire</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/6</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:20:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Gail Weiss</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>What is Feminist Phenomenology: Looking Backwards and Into the Future</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Silvia Stoller</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Is Direct Perception Arrogant Perception?:  Towards a Critical, Feminist Intercorporeity</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>April Flakne</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Feminist Phenomenology, Embedded Embodied Cognition, and [Pseudo] Scientific Gender Claims</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:20:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Veronica Vasterling</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>From Armchair to Wheelchair: How Patients with a Locked-in Syndrome Integrate Bodily Changes in Experienced Identity</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Marie-Christine Nizzi</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>Rotman Institute Speaker: Feminist Neo-materialism and the Future of Phenomenology</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fdfp/Program/Thursday/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:20:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Dorothea Olkowski</author>


</item>




<item>
<title>How do we create more effective online instructors?</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/ties/2013/Presentations/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/ties/2013/Presentations/10</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:45:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>An Example of Skills Development with the Instructional Skills Workshop Online;</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kim Holland</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
