<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Psychology Publications</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Western University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub</link>
<description>Recent documents in Psychology Publications</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:56:45 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Nature vs. Nurture: Are Leaders Born or Made? A Behavior Genetic Investigation of Leadership Style</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/98</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/98</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:32:23 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>With the recent resurgence in popularity of trait theories of leadership, it is timely to consider the genetic determination of the multiple factors comprising the leadership construct. Individual differences in personality traits have been found to be moderately to highly heritable, and so it follows that if there are reliable personality trait differences between leaders and non-leaders, then there may be a heritable component to these individual differences. Despite this connection between leadership and personality traits, however, there are no studies of the genetic basis of leadership using modern behavior genetic methodology. The present study proposes to address the lack of research in this area by examining the heritability of leadership style, as measured by self-report psychometric inventories. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), the Leadership Ability Evaluation, and the Adjective Checklist were completed by 247 adult twin pairs (183 monozygotic and 64 same-sex dizygotic). Results indicated that most of the leadership dimensions examined in this study are heritable, as are two higher level factors (resembling transactional and transformational leadership) derived from an obliquely rotated principal components factors analysis of the MLQ. Univariate analyses suggested that 48% of the variance in transactional leadership may be explained by additive heritability, and 59% of the variance in transformational leadership may be explained by non-additive (dominance) heritability. Multivariate analyses indicated that most of the variables studied shared substantial genetic covariance, suggesting a large overlap in the underlying genes responsible for the leadership dimensions.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Andrew M. Johnson et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Analysis of Variance</category>

<category>Factor Analysis, Statistical</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Genetic Variation</category>

<category>Genetics, Behavioral</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Leadership</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Middle Aged</category>

<category>Multivariate Analysis</category>

<category>Personality</category>

<category>Personality Inventory</category>

<category>Phenotype</category>

<category>Questionnaires</category>

<category>Twins</category>

<category>Twins, Dizygotic</category>

<category>Twins, Monozygotic</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Individual Differences in Multiple Dimensions of Aggression: A Univariate and Multivariate Genetic Analysis</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/97</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/97</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:25:01 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Previous behaviour genetic studies of aggression have yielded inconsistent results: reported heritabilities for different types of aggressive behaviour ranging from 0 to 0.98. In the present study, 247 adult twin pairs (183 MZ pairs; 64 same-sex DZ pairs) were administered seven self-report questionnaires which yielded 18 measures of aggression. Univariate genetic analyses showed moderate to high heritabilities for 14 of these 18 measures and for a general aggression factor and three correlated aggression factors extracted from the measures. Multivariate genetic analyses showed sizeable genetic correlations between the different dimensions of aggression. Thus, individual differences in many types of aggressive behaviour are attributable to some extent to genetic factors and there is considerable overlap between the genes that operate on different types of aggressive behaviour.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Philip A. Vernon et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Aggression</category>

<category>Analysis of Variance</category>

<category>Anger</category>

<category>Antisocial Personality Disorder</category>

<category>Attitude</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Hostility</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Impulsive Behavior</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Middle Aged</category>

<category>Mood Disorders</category>

<category>Multivariate Analysis</category>

<category>Questionnaires</category>

<category>Self-Assessment</category>

<category>Self-Injurious Behavior</category>

<category>Twins, Dizygotic</category>

<category>Twins, Monozygotic</category>

<category>Verbal Behavior</category>

<category>Violence</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The General Factor of Personality: A Critical Test</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/96</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/96</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:00:58 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The present study provides evidence supporting the presence of a General  Factor of Personality (GFP), which has been proposed to represent the  apex of the hierarchy of personality traits. Furthermore, the construct  validity of this general factor is assessed to address recent criticisms  suggesting that the GFP may merely be a statistical artefact rather  than a genuine higher-order personality dimension. In this study, two  samples of monozygotic (MZ) and same-sex dizygotic (DZ) twins completed  the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-IR), assessing individual  differences in the Big Five traits of personality, and the Dimensional  Assessment of Personality Problems–Differential Questionnaire (DAPP-DQ)  measuring variance in abnormal personality traits. First unrotated  factors were extracted from each of the two measures separately within  each sample. Correlations between these factors were significant and  high in both samples (.78 and .77), indicating that the factors  represent similar constructs. The manner in which these findings help to  validate the GFP is discussed.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Livia Veselka et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Age and Neuropsychological Status Following Exposure to Violent Nonimpact Acceleration Forces in MVAs</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/95</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/95</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:20:28 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Performance on the Halstead-ReitanNeuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)  was analyzed for 33 ind viduals, aged 20 to 69, who had been subjected  to violent aceeleration forces in motor vehicle accidents . Age was  considered as a continuous variable and correlated with single and  compos ite HRB measures. With the one exception of the Left  Neuropsychological Deficit Scale (NDS) score, agere lated de cline was  consistently demonstrated by com positeHRB scores (i.e., Gen eralNDS,  Right NDS, Level of Performance NDS, Pathognomonic SignNDS, Pattern NDS,  Right-Left Differ enceNDS, and Halstead Impairment Index). In contrast,  most single non-composite HRB measures did not refleet a substantive  relation ship between age andperformance. Single-score exceptions were  the Total Time, Memory and Local ization measures of the Tactual Perfor  mance Test (TPT), Category Test scores, and left auditory suppression.  Most significant correlations represented linear relationships, but  non-lin earrelation ships with age were found for the Total and  Localization scores of the TPT. In general, composite measures rather  than single scores of the HRB appear to be sensitive to the effects of  age invietims of nonimpact aceeleration forces.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>James E. Sweeney et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Sex Difference in Brain Nerve Conduction Velocity in Normal Humans</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/94</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/94</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:46:55 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Nerve conduction velocity (NCV), the speed at which impulses travel along nerves, has been extensively determined in human peripheral nerves because of its clinical utility. In contrast, almost no studies have been made of human brain NCV. We determined brain NCVs in the visual nerve pathway for 185 male and 200 female university students ages 18-25 years. In each of three independent test conditions, we found that the mean NCV of male students is about 4% faster than in females (P < or = 0.0001 for each condition). These male students also have a shorter reaction time in each of seven different RT tests than do females, even though, on the null hypothesis of equal NCVs, we would expect males to have longer RT times because of their greater physical size. Four of these comparisons are significant at or below the 0.001 level. These males also increase their NCVs with increasing age, in contrast to females. These sex differences in NCV parallel reported sex differences in age changes in white matter in the brain. These age changes may largely explain these NCV differences.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>T. Edward Reed et al.</author>


<category>Adolescent</category>

<category>Adult</category>

<category>Axons</category>

<category>Body Weights and Measures</category>

<category>Brain</category>

<category>Evoked Potentials, Visual</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Neural Conduction</category>

<category>Photic Stimulation</category>

<category>Reaction Time</category>

<category>Reference Values</category>

<category>Sex Characteristics</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Confirmation of Correlation between Brain Nerve Conduction Velocity and Intelligence Level in Normal Adults</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/93</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/93</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:41:01 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In 1992, Reed and Jensen [Intelligence 16 (1992) 259–272] reported a positive correlation (.26; <em>p</em>=.002;  .37 after correcting for restricted intelligence range) between a brain  nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and intelligence level in 147 normal  male students. In the first follow-up of their study, we report on a  study using similar NCV methodologies, but testing both male and female  students and using more extensive measures of cognitive abilities.  One-hundred eighty-six males and 201 females, aged 18–25 years, were  tested in three different NCV conditions and with nine cognitive tests,  including Raven Progressive Matrices as used by Reed and Jensen. None of  the 27 independent correlations in either the males or in the females  are significant at Bonferroni-corrected probability levels, but 25 of 27  correlations in males and 20 of 27 correlations in females have  positive signs. The exact binomial probabilities for these results are  5.6×10<sup>−6</sup> and .002, respectively. We discuss possible reasons  for the differences between the results of Reed and Jensen and our  results. We also find that males have four percent faster NCVs than  females with each of the three test conditions, probably due to their  faster increase of white matter in the brain during adolescence.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>T. Edward Reed et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Bedside Detection of Awareness in the Vegetative State: A Cohort Study</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/92</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/92</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:17:51 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Background: Patients diagnosed as vegetative have periods of wakefulness, but seem to be  unaware of themselves or their environment. Although functional MRI  (fMRI) studies have shown that some of these patients are consciously  aware, issues of expense and accessibility preclude the use of fMRI  assessment in most of these individuals. We aimed to assess bedside  detection of awareness with an electroencephalography (EEG) technique in  patients in the vegetative state.</p>
<p>Methods: This study was undertaken at two European centres. We recruited patients  with traumatic brain injury and non-traumatic brain injury who met the  Coma Recovery Scale-Revised definition of vegetative state. We developed  a novel EEG task involving motor imagery to detect command-following—a  universally accepted clinical indicator of awareness—in the absence of  overt behaviour. Patients completed the task in which they were required  to imagine movements of their right-hand and toes to command. We  analysed the command-specific EEG responses of each patient for robust  evidence of appropriate, consistent, and statistically reliable markers  of motor imagery, similar to those noted in healthy, conscious controls.</p>
<p>Findings: We assessed 16 patients diagnosed in the vegetative state, and 12 healthy  controls. Three (19%) of 16 patients could repeatedly and reliably  generate appropriate EEG responses to two distinct commands, despite  being behaviourally entirely unresponsive (classification accuracy  61—78%). We noted no significant relation between patients' clinical  histories (age, time since injury, cause, and behavioural score) and  their ability to follow commands. When separated according to cause, two  (20%) of the five traumatic and one (9%) of the 11 non-traumatic  patients were able to successfully complete this task.</p>
<p>Interpretation: Despite rigorous clinical assessment, many patients in the vegetative state are  misdiagnosed. The EEG method that we developed is cheap, portable,  widely available, and objective. It could allow the widespread use of  this bedside technique for the rediagnosis of patients who behaviourally  seem to be entirely vegetative, but who might have residual cognitive  function and conscious awareness.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Damian Cruse et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>In Vivo Dynamics of the Musculoskeletal System Cannot Be Adequately Described Using a Stiffness-Damping-Inertia Model</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/91</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/91</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:54:31 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: Visco-elastic properties of the (neuro-)musculoskeletal system play a fundamental role in the control of posture and movement. Often, these properties are described and identified using stiffness-damping-inertia (KBI) models. In such an approach, perturbations are applied to the (neuro-)musculoskeletal system and subsequently KBI-model parameters are optimized to obtain a best fit between simulated and experimentally observed responses. Problems with this approach may arise because a KBI-model neglects critical aspects of the real musculoskeletal system.</p>
<p>METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The purpose of this study was to analyze the relation between the musculoskeletal properties and the stiffness and damping estimated using a KBI-model, to analyze how this relation is affected by the nature of the perturbation and to assess the sensitivity of the estimated stiffness and damping to measurement errors. Our analyses show that the estimated stiffness and damping using KBI-models do not resemble any of the dynamical parameters of the underlying system, not even when the responses are very accurately fitted by the KBI-model. Furthermore, the stiffness and damping depend non-linearly on all the dynamical parameters of the underlying system, influenced by the nature of the perturbation and the time interval over which the KBI-model is optimized. Moreover, our analyses predict a very high sensitivity of estimated parameters to measurement errors.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest that the usage of stiffness-damping-inertia models to investigate the dynamical properties of the musculoskeletal system under control by the CNS should be reconsidered.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dinant A. Kistemaker et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Neural Correlates of Natural Human Echolocation in Early and Late Blind Echolocation Experts</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/90</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/90</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:46:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: A small number of blind people are adept at echolocating silent objects simply by producing mouth clicks and listening to the returning echoes. Yet the neural architecture underlying this type of aid-free human echolocation has not been investigated. To tackle this question, we recruited echolocation experts, one early- and one late-blind, and measured functional brain activity in each of them while they listened to their own echolocation sounds.</p>
<p>RESULTS: When we compared brain activity for sounds that contained both clicks and the returning echoes with brain activity for control sounds that did not contain the echoes, but were otherwise acoustically matched, we found activity in calcarine cortex in both individuals. Importantly, for the same comparison, we did not observe a difference in activity in auditory cortex. In the early-blind, but not the late-blind participant, we also found that the calcarine activity was greater for echoes reflected from surfaces located in contralateral space. Finally, in both individuals, we found activation in middle temporal and nearby cortical regions when they listened to echoes reflected from moving targets.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that processing of click-echoes recruits brain regions typically devoted to vision rather than audition in both early and late blind echolocation experts.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lore Thaler et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Mapping Proprioception across a 2D Horizontal Workspace</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/89</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/89</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:13:39 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Relatively few studies have been reported that document how proprioception varies across the workspace of the human arm. Here we examined proprioceptive function across a horizontal planar workspace, using a new method that avoids active movement and interactions with other sensory modalities. We systematically mapped both proprioceptive acuity (sensitivity to hand position change) and bias (perceived location of the hand), across a horizontal-plane 2D workspace. Proprioception of both the left and right arms was tested at nine workspace locations and in 2 orthogonal directions (left-right and forwards-backwards). Subjects made repeated judgments about the position of their hand with respect to a remembered proprioceptive reference position, while grasping the handle of a robotic linkage that passively moved their hand to each judgement location. To rule out the possibility that the memory component of the proprioceptive testing procedure may have influenced our results, we repeated the procedure in a second experiment using a persistent visual reference position. Both methods resulted in qualitatively similar findings. Proprioception is not uniform across the workspace. Acuity was greater for limb configurations in which the hand was closer to the body, and was greater in a forward-backward direction than in a left-right direction. A robust difference in proprioceptive bias was observed across both experiments. At all workspace locations, the left hand was perceived to be to the left of its actual position, and the right hand was perceived to be to the right of its actual position. Finally, bias was smaller for hand positions closer to the body. The results of this study provide a systematic map of proprioceptive acuity and bias across the workspace of the limb that may be used to augment computational models of sensory-motor control, and to inform clinical assessment of sensory function in patients with sensory-motor deficits.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Elizabeth T. Wilson et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Middle Aged</category>

<category>Models, Theoretical</category>

<category>Proprioception</category>

<category>Questionnaires</category>

<category>Young Adult</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Decoding Action Intentions from Preparatory Brain Activity in Human Parieto-frontal Networks</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/88</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/88</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:40:16 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>How and where in the human brain high-level sensorimotor processes such as intentions and decisions are coded remain important yet essentially unanswered questions. This is in part because, to date, decoding intended actions from brain signals has been primarily constrained to invasive neural recordings in nonhuman primates. Here we demonstrate using functional MRI (fMRI) pattern recognition techniques that we can also decode movement intentions from human brain signals, specifically object-directed grasp and reach movements, moments before their initiation. Subjects performed an event-related delayed movement task toward a single centrally located object (consisting of a small cube attached atop a larger cube). For each trial, after visual presentation of the object, one of three hand movements was instructed: grasp the top cube, grasp the bottom cube, or reach to touch the side of the object (without preshaping the hand). We found that, despite an absence of fMRI signal amplitude differences between the planned movements, the spatial activity patterns in multiple parietal and premotor brain areas accurately predicted upcoming grasp and reach movements. Furthermore, the patterns of activity in a subset of these areas additionally predicted which of the two cubes were to be grasped. These findings offer new insights into the detailed movement information contained in human preparatory brain activity and advance our present understanding of sensorimotor planning processes through a unique description of parieto-frontal regions according to the specific types of hand movements they can predict.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jason P. Gallivan et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Why Clowns Taste Funny: The Relationship between Humor and Semantic Ambiguity</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/87</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/87</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:24:15 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>What makes us laugh? One crucial component of many jokes is the disambiguation of words with multiple meanings. In this functional MRI study of normal participants, the neural mechanisms that underlie our experience of getting a joke that depends on the resolution of semantically ambiguous words were explored. Jokes that contained ambiguous words were compared with sentences that contained ambiguous words but were not funny, as well as to matched verbal jokes that did not depend on semantic ambiguity. The results confirm that both the left inferior temporal gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus are involved in processing the semantic aspects of language comprehension, while a more widespread network that includes both of these regions and the temporoparietal junction bilaterally is involved in processing humorous verbal jokes when compared with matched nonhumorous material. In addition, hearing jokes was associated with increased activity in a network of subcortical regions, including the amygdala, the ventral striatum, and the midbrain, that have been implicated in experiencing positive reward. Moreover, activity in these regions correlated with the subjective ratings of funniness of the presented material. These results allow a more precise account of how the neural and cognitive processes that are involved in ambiguity resolution contribute to the appreciation of jokes that depend on semantic ambiguity.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Tristan A. Bekinschtein et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Living in a Material World: How Visual Cues to Material Properties Affect the Way that We Lift Objects and Perceive Their Weight</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/86</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/86</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:43:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The visual properties of an object provide many cues as to the tensile strength, compliance, and density of the material from which it is made. However, it is not well understood how these implicit associations affect our perceptions of these properties and how they determine the initial forces that are applied when an object is picked up. Here we examine the effects of these cues on such forces by using the classic "material-weight illusion" (MWI). Grip and load forces were measured in three experiments as participants lifted cubes made from metal, wood, and expanded polystyrene. These cubes were adjusted to have a different mass than would be expected for a particular material. For the initial lifts, the forces were scaled to the expected weight of each object, such that the metal block was gripped and lifted with more force than the polystyrene one. After a few lifts, however, participants scaled their forces to the actual weight of the blocks, implicitly disregarding the misleading visual cues to each block's composition (experiments 1 and 2). Despite this rapid rescaling, participants experienced a robust MWI throughout the duration of the experiments. In fact, the grip and load forces never matched the perception of weight until the differences in the visual surface properties between the blocks were removed (experiment 3). These findings are discussed in relation to recent debates about the underlying causes of weight-based illusions and the effect of top-down visual cues on perception and action.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


<category>Adolescent</category>

<category>Adult</category>

<category>Biomechanics</category>

<category>Cues</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Hand Strength</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Lifting</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Photic Stimulation</category>

<category>Psychomotor Performance</category>

<category>Visual Perception</category>

<category>Weight Perception</category>

<category>Weight-Bearing</category>

<category>Young Adult</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Rightward Biases during Bimanual Reaching</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/85</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/85</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:42:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Two experiments were carried out to investigate whether attention is biased toward the right hand of right handers during bimanual coordination (Peters 1981). A novel discontinuous double-step reaching task was developed, where right-handed participants executed a bimanual reach followed by a left or right hand unimanual reach. Asymmetries in the downtime between the bimanual and unimanual reach portions (the refractory period) were used to infer the direction of attention. A shorter right hand refractory period was found in the first experiment, indicating a rightward bias in attention. In a second experiment, shifting the focus of attention during the bimanual portion of the reach altered the direction and magnitude of the asymmetry in a way consistent with the attentional bias hypothesis. The role of attention during bimanual reaching, and a further programme of experimental work aimed at clarifying the nature of these rightward biases during discrete bimanual coordination is discussed.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Analysis of Variance</category>

<category>Attention</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Functional Laterality</category>

<category>Hand</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Motor Activity</category>

<category>Psychomotor Performance</category>

<category>Reaction Time</category>

<category>Young Adult</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Gating of Vibrotactile Detection during Visually Guided Bimanual Reaches</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/84</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/84</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:31:59 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>It is far more difficult to detect a small tactile stimulation on a finger that is moving compared to when it is static. This suppression of tactile information during motion, known as tactile gating, has been examined in some detail during single-joint movements. However, the existence and time course of this gating has yet to be examined during visually guided multi-joint reaches, where sensory feedback may be paramount. The current study demonstrated that neurologically intact humans are unable to detect a small vibratory stimulus on one of their index fingers during a bimanual reach toward visual targets. By parametrically altering the delay between the visual target onset and the vibration, it was demonstrated that this gating was even apparent before participants started moving. A follow up experiment using electromyography indicated that gating was likely to occur even before muscle activity had taken place. This unique demonstration of tactile gating during a task reliant on visual feedback supports the notion this phenomenon is due to a central command, rather than a masking of sensory signals by afferent processing during movement.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Arm</category>

<category>Electromyography</category>

<category>Feedback, Physiological</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Fingers</category>

<category>Functional Laterality</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Joints</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Movement</category>

<category>Neuropsychological Tests</category>

<category>Photic Stimulation</category>

<category>Physical Stimulation</category>

<category>Proprioception</category>

<category>Psychomotor Performance</category>

<category>Sensory Gating</category>

<category>Sensory Receptor Cells</category>

<category>Touch</category>

<category>Touch Perception</category>

<category>Vibration</category>

<category>Young Adult</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Influence of Competing Perceptual and Motor Priors in the Context of the Size-weight Illusion</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/83</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/83</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:26:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>When lifting objects of identical mass but different sizes, people perceive the smaller objects as weighing more than the larger ones (the 'size-weight' illusion, SWI). While individual's grip and load force rates are rapidly scaled to the objects' actual mass, the magnitude of the force used to lift these SWI-inducing objects is rarely discussed. Here, we show that participants continue to apply a greater loading force to a large SWI-inducing cube than to a small SWI cube, lift after lift. These differences in load force persisted long after initial errors in grip and load force rates had been corrected. Interestingly, participants who showed the largest illusion made the smallest errors in load force. This unexpected relationship suggests that the motor system is consistently biased toward the expectations of heaviness for a particular stimulus in a Bayesian fashion, and that this loading error is subsequently reduced by SWI perceptual errors in the opposite direction.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Hand Strength</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Illusions</category>

<category>Kinesis</category>

<category>Lifting</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Photic Stimulation</category>

<category>Physical Exertion</category>

<category>Size Perception</category>

<category>Visual Perception</category>

<category>Weight Perception</category>

<category>Young Adult</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Lifting without Seeing: The Role of Vision in Perceiving and Acting upon the Size Weight Illusion</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/82</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/82</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:26:30 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: Our expectations of an object's heaviness not only drive our fingertip forces, but also our perception of heaviness. This effect is highlighted by the classic size-weight illusion (SWI), where different-sized objects of identical mass feel different weights. Here, we examined whether these expectations are sufficient to induce the SWI in a single wooden cube when lifted without visual feedback, by varying the size of the object seen prior to the lift.</p>
<p>METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants, who believed that they were lifting the same object that they had just seen, reported that the weight of the single, standard-sized cube that they lifted on every trial varied as a function of the size of object they had just seen. Seeing the small object before the lift made the cube feel heavier than it did after seeing the large object. These expectations also affected the fingertip forces that were used to lift the object when vision was not permitted. The expectation-driven errors made in early trials were not corrected with repeated lifting, and participants failed to adapt their grip and load forces from the expected weight to the object's actual mass in the same way that they could when lifting with vision.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Vision appears to be crucial for the detection, and subsequent correction, of the ostensibly non-visual grip and load force errors that are a common feature of this type of object interaction. Expectations of heaviness are not only powerful enough to alter the perception of a single object's weight, but also continually drive the forces we use to lift the object when vision is unavailable.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


<category>Adaptation, Physiological</category>

<category>Adult</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Illusions</category>

<category>Lifting</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Muscle Contraction</category>

<category>Muscle, Skeletal</category>

<category>Psychomotor Performance</category>

<category>Size Perception</category>

<category>Stress, Mechanical</category>

<category>Vision, Ocular</category>

<category>Weight Perception</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Bimanual Reaching across the Hemispace: Which Hand Is Yoked to Which?</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/81</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/81</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:54:52 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>When both hands perform concurrent goal-directed reaches, they become yoked to one another. To investigate the direction of this coupling (i.e., which hand is yoked to which), the temporal dynamics of bimanual reaches were compared with equivalent-amplitude unimanual reaches. These reaches were to target pairs located on either the left or right sides of space; meaning that in the bimanual condition, one hand's contralateral (more difficult) reach accompanied by the other hand's ipsilateral (easier) reach. By comparing which hand's difficult reach was improved more by the presence of the other hand's easier ipsilateral reach, we were able to demonstrate asymmetries in the coupling. When the cost of bimanual reaching was controlled for the contralateral reaching left hand's performance was improved, suggesting that the left hand is yoked to the right during motor output. In contrast, the right hand showed the greatest improvements for contralateral reaching in terms of reaction time, pointing toward a dominant role for the left hand in the processes prior to movement onset. The results may point toward a mechanism for integrating the unitary system of attention with bimanual coordination.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


<category>Adult</category>

<category>Attention</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Functional Laterality</category>

<category>Hand</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Movement</category>

<category>Neuropsychological Tests</category>

<category>Orientation</category>

<category>Psychomotor Performance</category>

<category>Reaction Time</category>

<category>Space Perception</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Asymmetries in Motor Attention during a Cued Bimanual Reaching Task: Left and Right Handers Compared</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/80</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/80</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:51:06 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Several studies have indicated that right handers have attention biased toward their right hand during bimanual coordination (Buckingham and Carey, 2009; Peters, 1981). To determine if this behavioral asymmetry was linked to cerebral lateralization, we examined this bias in left and right handers by combining a discontinuous double-step reaching task with a Posner-style hand cueing paradigm. Left and right handed participants received a tactile cue (valid on 80% of trials) prior to a bimanual reach to target pairs. Right handers took longer to inhibit their right hand and made more right hand errors, suggesting that their dominant hand was more readily primed to move than their non-dominant hand, likely due to the aforementioned attentional bias. Left handers, however, showed neither of these asymmetries, suggesting that they lack an equivalent dominant hand attentional bias. The findings are discussed in relation to recent unimanual handedness tasks in right and left handers, and the lateralization of systems for speech, language and motor attention.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Material-weight Illusion Induced by Expectations Alone</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/79</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/79</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:45:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In the material-weight illusion (MWI), equally weighted objects that appear to be made from different materials are incorrectly perceived as having different weights when they are lifted one after the other. Here, we show that continuous visual experience of the lift is not a prerequisite for this compelling misperception of weight; merely priming the lifters' expectations of heaviness is sufficient for them to experience a robust MWI. Furthermore, these expectations continued to influence the load force used to lift MWI-inducing stimuli trial after trial, supporting the notion that vision plays an important role in the skillful lifting of objects.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gavin Buckingham et al.</author>


<category>Aluminum</category>

<category>Discrimination (Psychology)</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Kinetics</category>

<category>Lifting</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Optical Illusions</category>

<category>Polystyrenes</category>

<category>Proprioception</category>

<category>Sensory Deprivation</category>

<category>Set (Psychology)</category>

<category>Weight Perception</category>

<category>Wood</category>

<category>Young Adult</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
