<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Department of Medicine Publications</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Western University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub</link>
<description>Recent documents in Department of Medicine Publications</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:03:24 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Identifying Substrate for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/147</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/147</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:51:02 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Background- Sudden cardiac death (SCD) and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) are frequently associated with prior or acute myocardial injury. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides morphological, functional, and tissue characterization in a single setting. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CMR-based imaging versus non-CMR-based imaging in patients with resuscitated SCD or SMVT. Methods and Results- Eighty-two patients with resuscitated SCD or SMVT underwent routine non-CMR imaging, followed by a CMR protocol with comprehensive tissue characterization. Clinical reports of non-CMR imaging studies were blindly adjudicated and used to assign each patient to 1 of 7 diagnostic categories. CMR imaging was blindly interpreted using a standardized algorithm used to assign a patient diagnosis category in a similar fashion. The diagnostic yield of CMR-based and non-CMR-based imaging, as well as the impact of the former on diagnosis reclassification, was established. Relevant myocardial disease was identified in 51% of patients using non-CMR-based imaging and in 74% using CMR-based imaging (P=0.002). Forty-one patients (50%) were reassigned to a new or alternate diagnosis using CMR-based imaging, including 15 (18%) with unsuspected acute myocardial injury. Twenty patients (24%) had no abnormality by non-CMR imaging but showed clinically relevant myocardial disease by CMR imaging. Conclusions- CMR-based imaging provides a robust diagnostic yield in patients presenting with resuscitated SCD or SMVT and incrementally identifies clinically unsuspected acute myocardial injury. When compared with non-CMR-based imaging, a new or alternate myocardial disease process may be identified in half of these patients.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>James A. White et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Asthma</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/146</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/146</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:35:01 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Asthma is the most common respiratory disorder in Canada. Despite significant improvement in the diagnosis and management    of this disorder, the majority of Canadians with asthma remain poorly controlled. In most patients, however, control can be    achieved through the use of avoidance measures and appropriate pharmacological interventions. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs)    represent the standard of care for the majority of patients. Combination ICS/long-acting beta<sub>2</sub>-agonists  (LABA) inhalers are preferred for most adults who fail to achieve  control with ICS therapy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy    represents a potentially disease-modifying therapy for many patients  with asthma, but should only be prescribed by physicians    with appropriate training in allergy. Regular monitoring of asthma  control, adherence to therapy and inhaler technique are    also essential components of asthma management. This article provides  a review of current literature and guidelines for the    appropriate diagnosis and management of asthma.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Harold L. Kim et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Allergic Rhinitis</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/145</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/145</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:34:59 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Allergic rhinitis is a common disorder that is strongly linked to asthma and conjunctivitis. It is usually a long-standing    condition that often goes undetected in the primary-care setting. The classic symptoms of the disorder are nasal congestion,    nasal itch, rhinorrhea and sneezing. A thorough history, physical examination and allergen skin testing are important for    establishing the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Second-generation oral antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids are    the mainstay of treatment. Allergen immunotherapy is an effective immune-modulating treatment that should be recommended if    pharmacologic therapy for allergic rhinitis is not effective or is not tolerated. This article provides an overview of the    pathophysiology, diagnosis, and appropriate management of this disorder.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Peter Small et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Allergen-specific Immunotherapy</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/144</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/144</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:34:56 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Allergen-specific immunotherapy is a potentially disease-modifying therapy that is effective for the treatment of allergic    rhinitis/conjunctivitis, allergic asthma and stinging insect hypersensitivity. However, despite its proven efficacy in these    conditions, it is frequently underutilized in Canada. The decision to proceed with allergen-specific immunotherapy should    be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account individual patient factors such as the degree to which symptoms can be    reduced by avoidance measures and pharmacological therapy, the amount and type of medication required to control symptoms,    the adverse effects of pharmacological treatment, and patient preferences. Since this form of therapy carries the risk of    anaphylactic reactions, it should only be prescribed by physicians who are adequately trained in the treatment of allergy.    Furthermore, injections must be given under medical supervision in clinics that are equipped to manage anaphylaxis. In this    article, the authors review the indications and contraindications, patient selection criteria, and the administration, safety    and efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>William Moote et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Anaphylaxis</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/143</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/143</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:34:54 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal systemic reaction with varied  mechanisms and clinical presentations. Although prompt    recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis are imperative, both  patients and healthcare professionals often fail to recognize    and diagnose early signs and symptoms of the condition. Clinical  manifestations vary widely, however, the most common signs    are cutaneous symptoms, including angioedema, urticaria, erythema and  pruritus. Immediate intramuscular administration of    epinephrine into the lateral thigh is first-line therapy, even if the  diagnosis is uncertain. The mainstays of long-term management    include specialist assessment, avoidance measures, and the provision  of an epinephrine auto-injector and an individualized    anaphylaxis action plan. This article provides an overview of the  causes, clinical features, diagnosis and acute and long-term    management of this serious allergic reaction.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Harold Kim et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>An introduction to immunology and immunopathology</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/142</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/142</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:20:35 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In basic terms, the immune system has two lines of defense: innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity is the    first immunological, non-specific (antigen-independent) mechanism for fighting against an intruding pathogen. It is a rapid    immune response, occurring within minutes or hours after aggression, that has no immunologic memory. Adaptive immunity, on    the other hand, is antigen-dependent and antigen-specific; it has the capacity for memory, which enables the host to mount    a more rapid and efficient immune response upon subsequent exposure to the antigen. There is a great deal of synergy between    the adaptive immune system and its innate counterpart, and defects in either system can provoke illness or disease, such as    autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiency disorders and hypersensitivity reactions. This article provides a practical overview    of innate and adaptive immunity, and describes how these host defense mechanisms are involved in both health and illness.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Richard Warrington et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Introduction from the Editors</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/141</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/141</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:15:46 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Harold L. Kim et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Adrenal Suppression: A Practical Guide to the Screening and Management of This Under-recognized Complication of Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/140</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/140</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:16:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents available for the treatment of asthma and represent the mainstay of therapy for most patients with the disease. Although these medications are considered safe at low-to-moderate doses, safety concerns with prolonged use of high ICS doses remain; among these concerns is the risk of adrenal suppression (AS). AS is a condition characterized by the inability to produce adequate amounts of the glucocorticoid, cortisol, which is critical during periods of physiological stress. It is a proven, yet under-recognized, complication of most forms of glucocorticoid therapy that can persist for up to 1 year after cessation of corticosteroid treatment. If left unnoticed, AS can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. More than 60 recent cases of AS have been described in the literature and almost all cases have involved children being treated with ≥500 μg/day of fluticasone.</p>
<p>The risk for AS can be minimized through increased awareness and early recognition of at-risk patients, regular patient follow-up to ensure that the lowest effective ICS doses are being utilized to control asthma symptoms, and by choosing an ICS medication with minimal adrenal effects. Screening for AS should be considered in any child with symptoms of AS, children using high ICS doses, or those with a history of prolonged oral corticosteroid use. Cases of AS should be managed in consultation with a pediatric endocrinologist whenever possible. In patients with proven AS, stress steroid dosing during times of illness or surgery is needed to simulate the protective endogenous elevations in cortisol levels that occur with physiological stress.</p>
<p>This article provides an overview of current literature on AS as well as practical recommendations for the prevention, screening and management of this serious complication of ICS therapy.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Alexandra Ahmet et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Developing a Curriculum Framework for Global Health in Family Medicine: Emerging Principles, Competencies, and Educational Approaches</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/139</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/139</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:19:16 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: Recognizing the growing demand from medical students and residents for more comprehensive global health training, and the paucity of explicit curricula on such issues, global health and curriculum experts from the six Ontario Family Medicine Residency Programs worked together to design a framework for global health curricula in family medicine training programs.</p>
<p>METHODS: A working group comprised of global health educators from Ontario's six medical schools conducted a scoping review of global health curricula, competencies, and pedagogical approaches. The working group then hosted a full day meeting, inviting experts in education, clinical care, family medicine and public health, and developed a consensus process and draft framework to design global health curricula. Through a series of weekly teleconferences over the next six months, the framework was revised and used to guide the identification of enabling global health competencies (behaviours, skills and attitudes) for Canadian Family Medicine training.</p>
<p>RESULTS: The main outcome was an evidence-informed interactive framework http://globalhealth.ennovativesolution.com/ to provide a shared foundation to guide the design, delivery and evaluation of global health education programs for Ontario's family medicine residency programs. The curriculum framework blended a definition and mission for global health training, core values and principles, global health competencies aligning with the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) competencies, and key learning approaches. The framework guided the development of subsequent enabling competencies.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: The shared curriculum framework can support the design, delivery and evaluation of global health curriculum in Canada and around the world, lay the foundation for research and development, provide consistency across programmes, and support the creation of learning and evaluation tools to align with the framework. The process used to develop this framework can be applied to other aspects of residency curriculum development.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lynda Redwood-Campbell et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>&apos;Is That Normal?&apos; Pre-clerkship Students&apos; Approaches to Professional Dilemmas</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/138</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/138</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:50:33 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVES: Context has been recognised as a key variable in studies of medical student professionalism, yet the effect of students' stage of training has not been well explored, despite growing recognition that medical students begin to form their professional ethos from their earliest medical school experiences. The purpose of this study, which builds on previous research involving clinical clerks, was to explore the decision-making processes of pre-clerkship medical students in the face of standardised professional dilemmas.</p>
<p>METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted with 30 pre-clerkship (Years 1 and 2) medical students at one institution. During the interviews, students were asked to respond to five videotaped scenarios, each of which depicted a student facing a professional dilemma. Transcripts were analysed using an existing theoretical framework based on a constructivist grounded theory approach.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Pre-clerkship students' approaches to professional dilemmas were largely similar to those of clerks, despite their limited clinical experience, with several notable exceptions. For example, reliance on instincts and emotions was not as pervasive, but concerns with systems-associated issues were more recurrent. These findings were explored in the context of theory on professional identity formation.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: As the novice student constructs a professional identity, he or she may feel the need to take on the role of doctor and shed that of student, a process that involves the suppressing of emotions, but this may be misguided. Educators should be aware of these stages of identity formation and tailor their teaching and evaluation of professionalism accordingly.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Shiphra Ginsburg et al.</author>


<category>Attitude of Health Personnel</category>

<category>Clinical Clerkship</category>

<category>Cohort Studies</category>

<category>Decision Making</category>

<category>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Physician-Patient Relations</category>

<category>Professional Competence</category>

<category>Teaching</category>

<category>Videotape Recording</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Evaluation of a Preoperative Team Briefing: A New Communication Routine Results in Improved Clinical Practice</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/137</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/137</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:45:41 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Background: Suboptimal communication within healthcare teams can lead to adverse patient outcomes. Team briefings were previously associated with improved communication patterns, and we assessed the impact of briefings on clinical practice. To quantify the impact of the preoperative team briefing on direct patient care, we studied the timing of preoperative antibiotic administration as compared to accepted treatment guidelines.</p>
<p>Study design: A retrospective pre-intervention/post-intervention study design assessed the impact of a checklist-guided preoperative team briefing on prophylactic antibiotic administration timing in surgical cases (N=340 pre-intervention and N=340 post-intervention) across three institutions. χ(2) Analyses were performed to determine whether there was a significant difference in timely antibiotic administration between the study phases.</p>
<p>Results: The process of collecting and analysing these data proved to be more complicated than expected due to great variability in documentation practices, both between study sites and between individual practitioners. In cases where the timing of antibiotics administration was documented unambiguously in the chart (n=259 pre-intervention and n=283 post-intervention), antibiotic prophylaxis was on time for 77.6% of cases in the pre-intervention phase of the study, and for 87.6% of cases in the post-intervention phase (p<0.01).</p>
<p>Conclusions: Use of a preoperative team checklist briefing was associated with improved physician compliance with antibiotic administration guidelines. Based on the results, recommendations to enhance timely antibiotic therapy are provided.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lorelei Lingard et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Teaching and Learning Communication in Medicine: A Rhetorical Approach</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/136</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/136</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:28:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The language people use both makes possible and constrains the thoughts they can have. More than just a vehicle for ideas, language shapes ideas--and the practices that follow from them. Thus, in medical education, teaching students how to talk about medical cases also teaches them how to think about patients and medical work, and how to define their relationships to both. Without a theoretical model, however, teaching efforts in this domain tend to be implicit and ad hoc, which can lead to serious problems. Rhetoric is one science that can deepen understanding of communication and improve teaching of this clinical skill. Rhetoric systematically studies the relationships between communication and its effects, between how things are named and how they are experienced, between discourse and socialization. Bringing language to the foreground of education, rhetoric directs attention to the relationship between what medical students learn to say and what they learn to value, believe, and practice.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lorelei Lingard et al.</author>


<category>Clinical Competence</category>

<category>Communication</category>

<category>Education, Medical</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Learning</category>

<category>Models, Theoretical</category>

<category>Teaching</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Daughter&apos;s Double Bind: The Single-parent Family as Cultural Analogue in Two Turn-of-the-century Dramas</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/135</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/135</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:28:18 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Lorelei Lingard</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Context, Conflict, and Resolution: A New Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Professionalism</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/134</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/134</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:18:08 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Shiphra Ginsburg et al.</author>


<category>Attitude of Health Personnel</category>

<category>Communication</category>

<category>Conflict (Psychology)</category>

<category>Ethics, Medical</category>

<category>Humanism</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Interpersonal Relations</category>

<category>Problem Solving</category>

<category>Professional Practice</category>

<category>Students, Medical</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>What Do We Mean by &quot;Relevance&quot;?  A Clinical and Rhetorical Definition with Implications for Teaching and Learning the Case-presentation Format</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/133</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/133</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:18:06 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Lorelei A. Lingard et al.</author>


<category>Clinical Clerkship</category>

<category>Clinical Competence</category>

<category>Communication</category>

<category>Decision Making</category>

<category>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</category>

<category>Faculty, Medical</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Internal Medicine</category>

<category>Interviews as Topic</category>

<category>Learning</category>

<category>Students, Medical</category>

<category>Teaching</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Rhetoric of Rationalization: How Students Grapple with Professional Dilemmas</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/132</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/132</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:02:28 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Lorelei Lingard et al.</author>


<category>Decision Making</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Rationalization</category>

<category>Students, Medical</category>

<category>United States</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Learning Oral Presentation Skills A Rhetorical Analysis with Pedagogical and Professional Implications</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/131</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/131</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:02:25 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVE: Oral presentation skills are central to physician-physician communication; however, little is known about how these skills are learned. Rhetoric is a social science which studies communication in terms of context and explores the action of language on knowledge, attitudes, and values. It has not previously been applied to medical discourse. We used rhetorical principles to qualitatively study how students learn oral presentation skills and what professional values are communicated in this process.</p>
<p>DESIGN: Descriptive study.</p>
<p>SETTING: Inpatient general medicine service in a university-affiliated public hospital.</p>
<p>PARTICIPANTS: Twelve third-year medical students during their internal medicine clerkship and 14 teachers.</p>
<p>MEASUREMENTS: One-hundred sixty hours of ethnographic observation. including 73 oral presentations on rounds. Discoursed-based interviews of 8 students and 10 teachers. Data were qualitatively analyzed to uncover recurrent patterns of communication.</p>
<p>MAIN RESULTS: Students and teachers had different perceptions of the purpose of oral presentation, and this was reflected in performance. Students described and conducted the presentation as a rule-based, data-storage activity governed by "order" and "structure." Teachers approached the presentation as a flexible means of "communication" and a method for "constructing" the details of a case into a diagnostic or therapeutic plan. Although most teachers viewed oral presentations rhetorically (sensitive to context), most feedback that students received was implicit and acontextual, with little guidance provided for determining relevant content. This led to dysfunctional generalizations by students, sometimes resulting in worse communication skills (e.g., comment "be brief" resulted in reading faster rather than editing) and unintended value acquisition (e.g., request for less social history interpreted as social history never relevant).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Students learn oral presentation by trial and error rather than through teaching of an explicit rhetorical model. This may delay development of effective communication skills and result in acquisition of unintended professional values. Teaching and learning of oral presentation skills may be improved by emphasizing that context determines content and by making explicit the tacit rules of presentation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Richard J. Haber et al.</author>


<category>Communication</category>

<category>Education, Medical</category>

<category>Female</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Interprofessional Relations</category>

<category>Interviews as Topic</category>

<category>Language</category>

<category>Male</category>

<category>Professional Competence</category>

<category>Social Values</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Time as a Catalyst for Tension in Nurse-surgeon Communication</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/130</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/130</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:54:33 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Carefully studying communication patterns between nurses and surgeons questions popular stereotypes about OR discourse and expands educators' understanding of the factors that motivate team communication, patterns that are habitual among team members, and issues that act as catalysts for tension. This study examines the nature of communication between perioperative nurses and surgeons and identifies patterns and sites of tension. Researchers observed 128 hours of interaction between nurses and surgeons in four surgical divisions at one teaching hospital in Ontario, Canada. Field notes were read, coded, and analyzed independently. Results showed that higher tension in nurse-surgeon communication clusters around particular themes, the most dominant of which is time. Analysis of this theme reveals communication strategies that allow surgeons and nurses to achieve individual goals and support social cohesion among team members.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sherry L. Espin et al.</author>


<category>Anesthesiology</category>

<category>Appointments and Schedules</category>

<category>Communication</category>

<category>General Surgery</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Observation</category>

<category>Ontario</category>

<category>Patient Care Team</category>

<category>Perioperative Nursing</category>

<category>Physician-Nurse Relations</category>

<category>Stress, Psychological</category>

<category>Time Factors</category>

<category>Time Management</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Pulling Together and Pushing Apart: Tides of Tension in the ICU Team</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/129</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/129</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:54:30 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Laura A. Hawryluck et al.</author>


<category>Anthropology, Cultural</category>

<category>Attitude of Health Personnel</category>

<category>Communication</category>

<category>Conflict (Psychology)</category>

<category>Cooperative Behavior</category>

<category>Group Processes</category>

<category>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</category>

<category>Hospitals, Teaching</category>

<category>Hospitals, Urban</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Intensive Care</category>

<category>Internship and Residency</category>

<category>Interprofessional Relations</category>

<category>Leadership</category>

<category>Medical Staff, Hospital</category>

<category>Nurse&apos;s Role</category>

<category>Nursing Staff, Hospital</category>

<category>Patient Care Team</category>

<category>Physician&apos;s Role</category>

<category>Students, Nursing</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Anatomy of the Professional Lapse: Bridging the Gap between Traditional Frameworks and Students&apos; Perceptions</title>
<link>http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/128</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/medpub/128</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:42:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>PURPOSE: To support students' developing professionalism, it is necessary to understand the professional challenges and dilemmas they perceive in the clinical setting. This study systematically documented and catalogued students' reports of professional lapses.</p>
<p>METHOD: Six focus groups were conducted with senior medical students (n = 29) at three universities. Using a grounded-theory approach, three researchers analyzed the students' reports of specific lapses in professionalism for recurrent themes. The resulting coding structure was applied using NVivo qualitative data analysis software.</p>
<p>RESULTS: A total of 120 pages of text yielded 48 specific incidents of professional lapses, which were analyzed by three researchers using grounded theory. Most incidents were witnessed (n = 34) or known about (n = 4), as opposed to self-reported (n = 10). Six critical "issues" emerged: communicative violations (to or about patients or other health care professionals); role resistance (individuals chafing against constraints or expectations of their perceived roles); objectification of patients (ignoring patients or treating patients as vehicles for learning); accountability (to colleagues or patients, including avoiding patients, failing to disclose information, or failing to treat appropriately); physical harm (to patients or others); and crossfire (being put in the middle of a struggle between superiors).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: This study explored how students experienced and operationalized professionalism in clinical settings at a variety of universities. Interestingly, the critical issues they reported as salient did not map easily onto standard, abstract definitions of professionalism. This incongruence suggested that the development of effective curricula in this domain must bridge the gap between traditional taxonomies and students' perceptions of professionalism.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Shiphra Ginsburg et al.</author>


<category>Canada</category>

<category>Ethics, Clinical</category>

<category>Focus Groups</category>

<category>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Physician&apos;s Role</category>

<category>Physician-Patient Relations</category>

<category>Professional Competence</category>

<category>Professional Misconduct</category>

<category>Social Perception</category>

<category>Social Responsibility</category>

<category>Students, Medical</category>

<category>United States</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
